'Assessments' and 'prognostication' DO NOTHING unless you map EXACT RECOVERY PROTOCOLS TO THEM! This was absolutely useless for getting survivors recovered! Stroke research is to get survivors recovered; you'll want recovery when you are the 1 in 4 per WHO that has a stroke! Just maybe you want to do the proper research now!
WITH NO LEADERSHIP IN STROKE NOTHNING EVER GETS DONE PROPERLY!
Prognostic assessment of acute ischemic stroke by systemic immune-inflammatory index: a comprehensive meta-analysis of multidimensional outcomes
- 1The Second Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
- 2Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
- 3Department of Neurology, Quzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Quzhou, China
- 4The First Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
Introduction: Our study aimed to quantify the predictive ability of the Systemic Immune-inflammatory Index (SII) for predicting the prognosis and multidimensional complications in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. The primary outcome was poor prognosis, and secondary outcomes included mortality, severity, hemorrhagic transformation/symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, stroke-associated pneumonia/poststroke pneumonia, early neurological deterioration, post-stroke depression, progression or recurrence, and other adverse outcomes.
Methods: We searched 15 databases from their establishment to 13 October 2024 and selected cohort or case-control analyses that analyzed the association of continuous or categorized SII as exposures with the above adverse outcomes of AIS populations.
Results: The results showed that 78 studies with 40,682 participants were included in meta-analyses. Continuous SII values were significantly higher in poor prognosis groups than in controls (SMD = 248.13, 95% CI: 198.77 to 297.50; p = 0.000). Poor prognosis incidences rose with higher continuous SII values (OR = 1.004, 95% CI: 1.002 to 1.005; p = 0.000). More patients in High SII groups had poor prognosis (RR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.66 to 2.28; p = 0.000). The risk of poor prognosis was higher in the high SII groups, though this was not statistically significant (OR = 1.007, 95% CI: 0.998 to 1.015; p = 0.120).
Discussion: In conclusion, our study found that continuous SII and high SII were associated with poor prognosis of AIS and various complications. Given the accessibility and low cost of SII, integrating it into prognostic scores merits further research for better clinical choices.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO (CRD42024586414), https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024586414.
Yifan Cui1
No comments:
Post a Comment