Deans' stroke musings: Stroke Rehabilitation: Which is the Main Functional Outcome to Reach?

Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Friday, October 31, 2025

Stroke Rehabilitation: Which is the Main Functional Outcome to Reach?

Silly question! The only goal in stroke is 100% recovery! You just proved your incompetence to be in stroke!

Stroke Rehabilitation: Which is the Main Functional Outcome to Reach?

Loredana Cavalli*, Andrea Guazzini, Bruno Rossi and Carmelo Chisari University of Florence, Italy

Abstract

Background:

Stroke rehabilitation targets range from treatment of spasticity to pain reduction, gait speed gain, or autonomy amelioration. A correct evaluation of individual residual capabilities is essential to select the most appropriate rehabilitative programme; furthermore the observation of rehabilitative outcomes can provide information about gait training effects and possible compensation mechanisms.

Aim:

To investigate the main outcome to reach in stroke rehabilitation.

Methods:

We examined retrospectively a heterogeneous sample of 119 subjects recovered for the treatment of stroke outcomes. Functional parameters were assessed before and after rehabilitative treatment, such as upper limbs motility impairment, lower limb sensitiveness, muscle trophism or tone, necessity of auxilium, Berg and Fugl-Meyer scale.

Results: A consistent improvement of standing equilibrium was reported, regardless of gender, stroke nature, hemiparetic side, type of rehabilitation performed, botulin toxin use and initial conditions, with an average increase of Berg and Fugl-Meyer scales score of 14% and 21%, respectively. The variation of equilibrium and motility across treatment resulted directly proportional and negatively correlated to lower limbs sensitivity impairment. On the contrary, initial equilibrium resulted inversely correlated with the variation of motility and vice versa. Interestingly, older subjects seem to better increase equilibrium and sensitivity as measured by Fugl-Meyer scale.

Conclusion:

In stroke subjects any type of rehabilitation leads to a consistent improvement of standing balance. While proportional to motility and sensitivity increase, this result is inversely correlated to initial motility score, suggesting that an appropriate evaluation of the stroke patient’s functional parameters at admission contributes to select the main rehabilitation targets and the best therapeutic strategy.