Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Systematic evaluation of predictive models for futile recanalization before thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke

Where is the research that will create successful recanalization every time? Leadership is totally missing in stroke, so you better hope you're not the 1 in 4 per WHO that has a stroke

 Systematic evaluation of predictive models for futile recanalization before thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke


Cheng Chen&#x;Cheng Chen1Lei Liu&#x;Lei Liu2Xiaoling LiuXiaoling Liu3Ya Tan
Ya Tan4*
  • 1Department of Pain, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, China
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology, West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • 3Department of Rehabilitation, Suining First People's Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, China
  • 4Department of Geriatrics, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, China

Objective: To systematically review existing predictive models for futile recanalization after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke, in order to provide a basis for treatment decision-making.

Methods: Relevant studies on predictive models of futile recanalization after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases from inception to May 5, 2024. Reference lists were also manually searched as supplements. Two researchers independently performed the literature search, screening, and data extraction, and conducted risk of bias and quality assessments. Because most included studies did not provide 95% confidence intervals or standard errors of AUC values, a formal quantitative meta-analysis of model performance was not feasible. Instead, we conducted a stratified descriptive synthesis of AUC values according to modeling approach (traditional regression vs. machine learning/deep learning).

Results: Thirteen studies were included, encompassing 23 predictive models for futile recanalization. Variables used in the models mainly involved baseline clinical and imaging features. The most frequently included predictors were age, NIHSS score, baseline mRS score, and baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). The AUC of the models ranged from 0.650 to 0.981, with 11 models reporting AUC values ≥0.8, indicating high predictive performance.

Conclusion: Predictive models for futile recanalization after mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke are still under development. While many models exhibit good discrimination, they commonly face a high risk of bias. Future research should emphasize external validation and optimization of existing models to improve their performance, reduce bias, and promote clinical implementation.(Future research should solve the problem you blithering idiots! SOLVE THE PROBLEM!)

Systematic review registration: The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO under the ID CRD42022382797. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022382797.

No comments:

Post a Comment