My motivation is to prove how little my doctor actually knew and that it wasn't that hard to become an expert. But I wouldn't recommend my doctors non method at all. His sense of motivation must have been, keep every patient totally in the dark.
I can't find the questionnaire at all to see if it's anywhere close to valid.
1. http://ajgg.org/AJGG/V7N2/2011-99.pdf
ABSTRACT
Objective. To develop and validate a Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation
Scale (SRMS).
Methods. In stage 1, the 28-item SRMS was adapted from the Sports
Motivation Scale and tested for internal and inter-rater reliability in 18
patients. The 7 most reliable items were selected for the 7-item SRMS.
In stage 2, the 7-item SRMS was tested in 13 additional patients.
Results. In a group of 19 men and 12 women, the mean total score of
the 7-item SRMS was 24.1 (standard deviation, 4.6; range, 7-35). 25
patients had normal-to-high motivation (score of ≥21) and 6 had low
motivation (score of less than 20). Good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha
of >0.5) and inter-rater reliability (as measured by intra-class correlation
coefficient of >0.5) was demonstrated in the 28-item group (n=18).
There was less consistency in the 7-item sample; the Cronbach’s alpha
for intrinsic items was 0.61, but was only 0.27 for extrinsic items.
Conclusion. The 28-item SMRS showed good inter-rater reliability
and internal consistency. The reliability of the 28-item SRMS suggests
that adaptation of the SRMS from the Sports Motivation Scale was
successful.
2. A Master thesis here:
Pilot reliability and validity of the stroke rehabilitation motivation scale
No comments:
Post a Comment