http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/12/1/24/abstract
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2015, 12:24
doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0012-x
Published: 27 February 2015
Published: 27 February 2015
Abstract
Background
Previous reports of the mechanics and energetics of post-stroke hemiparetic walking
have either not combined estimates of mechanical and metabolic energy or computed
external mechanical work based on the limited combined limbs method. Here we present
a comparison of the mechanics and energetics of hemiparetic and unimpaired walking
at a matched speed.
Methods
Mechanical work done on the body centre of mass (COM) was computed by the individual
limbs method and work done at individual leg joints was computed with an inverse dynamics
analysis. Both estimates were converted to average powers and related to simultaneous
estimates of net metabolic power, determined via indirect calorimetry. Efficiency
of positive work was calculated as the ratio of average positive mechanical power
to net metabolic power.
Results
Total was 20% greater for the hemiparetic group (H) than for the unimpaired control group
(C) (0.49 vs. 0.41 W · kg−1). The greater was partly attributed to the paretic limb of hemiparetic walkers not providing appropriately
timed push-off in the step-to-step transition. This led to compensatory non-paretic limb hip and
knee which resulted in greater total mechanical work. Efficiency of positive work was
not different between H and C.
Conclusions
Increased work, not decreased efficiency, explains the greater metabolic cost of hemiparetic
walking post-stroke. Our results highlighted the need to target improving paretic
ankle push-off via therapy or assistive technology in order to reduce the metabolic
cost of hemiparetic walking.
No comments:
Post a Comment