Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, December 28, 2015

Stroke Location Is an Independent Predictor of Cognitive Outcome

DUH! Do you have to be smarter than a fifth grader to know that? My stroke blew out my motor and premotor cortex, so I would expect my cognition not to be affected.
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/47/1/66.abstract?etoc

  1. Thomas Tourdias, MD, PhD
+ Author Affiliations
  1. From the Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France (F.M., C.R.G., V.D., I.S., T.T.); Neuroimagerie diagnostique et thérapeutique (F.M., A.B., V.D., T.T.), Unité neurovasculaire (S.S., S.D., M.P., P.R., I.S.), and Pôle de santé publique, Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologique (J.A., P.P.), CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; INSERM, U862, Neurocentre Magendie, Bordeaux, France (F.M., V.D., T.T.); Center for Neurological Imaging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (C.R.G.); and INCIA, Bordeaux, France (I.S.).
  1. Correspondence to Thomas Tourdias, MD, PhD, Neuroradiology, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux University Hospital, Place Amélie Raba-Léon, Bordeaux F-33076, France. E-mail thomas.tourdias@chu-bordeaux.fr

Abstract

Background and Purpose—On top of functional outcome, accurate prediction of cognitive outcome for stroke patients is an unmet need with major implications for clinical management. We investigated whether stroke location may contribute independent prognostic value to multifactorial predictive models of functional and cognitive outcomes.
Methods—Four hundred twenty-eight consecutive patients with ischemic stroke were prospectively assessed with magnetic resonance imaging at 24 to 72 hours and at 3 months for functional outcome using the modified Rankin Scale and cognitive outcome using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Statistical maps of functional and cognitive eloquent regions were derived from the first 215 patients (development sample) using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. We used multivariate logistic regression models to study the influence of stroke location (number of eloquent voxels from voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping maps), age, initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and stroke volume on modified Rankin Scale and MoCA. The second part of our cohort was used as an independent replication sample.
Results—In univariate analyses, stroke location, age, initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and stroke volume were all predictive of poor modified Rankin Scale and MoCA. In multivariable analyses, stroke location remained the strongest independent predictor of MoCA and significantly improved the prediction compared with using only age, initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and stroke volume (area under the curve increased from 0.697–0.771; difference=0.073; 95% confidence interval, 0.008–0.155). In contrast, stroke location did not persist as independent predictor of modified Rankin Scale that was mainly driven by initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (area under the curve going from 0.840 to 0.835). Similar results were obtained in the replication sample.
Conclusions—Stroke location is an independent predictor of cognitive outcome (MoCA) at 3 months post stroke.

No comments:

Post a Comment