http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ane.12542/abstract;jsessionid=F1FABB4706C160DE11D0DA4F08375696.f02t02?userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=
Article first published online: 15 DEC 2015
DOI: 10.1111/ane.12542
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Issue
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- activities of daily living;
- stroke;
- complex interventions;
- length of stay;
- rehabilitation;
- shift analysis
Objectives
Inpatient
rehabilitation is a commonly used complex intervention to improve a
person's independence after stroke. Evaluation and comparison of the
effects of routine clinical practice could provide a contribution
towards optimization of stroke care. The aim of this study is to
describe results of inpatient rehabilitation as a complex intervention
for persons after stroke and explore possible differences between two
countries.
Methods
Data
from 1055 Latvian and 1748 Swedish adult patients after stroke
receiving inpatient rehabilitation, during 2011–2013, were used for this
retrospective cohort study. Qualitative description of systems, as well
as information on basic medical and sociodemographic information, and
organizational aspects were reported. Change in the Functional
Independence Measure during rehabilitation was investigated. In six
domains of the instrument, the shifts for three levels of dependence
were analysed using ordinal regression analysis.
Results
The
components of stroke care seem to be similar in Latvia and Sweden.
However, the median time since stroke onset until the start of
rehabilitation was 13 weeks in Latvia and 2 weeks in Sweden. The median
length of rehabilitation was 12 and 49 days, respectively. The level of
dependency at start, time since stroke onset and length of the period
had an impact on the results of the rehabilitation.
Conclusions
Although
components of the rehabilitation are reported as being the same,
characteristics and the outcome of the inpatient rehabilitation are
different. Therefore, comparison of stroke rehabilitation between
countries requires caution.
No comments:
Post a Comment