http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999315015014
Choose an option to locate/access this article:
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution
Check accessAbstract
Objective
To
compare length of stay, functional status, and discharge destination
between individuals who fell during in-patient stroke rehabilitation and
those who did not fall. We hypothesized that individuals who fell would
have poorer recovery compared to those who did not fall.
Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting
Rehabilitation hospital.
Participants
106
individuals who fell during in-patient stroke rehabilitation
(‘fallers’; mean age=67.8 years, SD =12.9; mean time post-stroke=26.4
days, SD=28.3) were matched to 106 individuals who did not fall
(‘non-fallers’; mean age=67.3 years, SD=13.6; mean time post-stroke=21.9
days, SD=28.8) on age and functional status.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main outcome measures
Total length of stay, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) assessed at discharge, and discharge destination.
Results
The
mean length of stay for fallers was 11 days longer than non-fallers
(p=0.0017). Non-fallers and fallers did not differ on discharge total
FIM scores (p=0.19), and both groups were discharged home after
in-patient rehabilitation (non-fallers: 77%; fallers: 74%; p=0.52)
Conclusions
This
study suggests that falls experienced during in-patient stroke
rehabilitation may have contributed to a longer length of stay; however,
falls did not impact discharge functional status or discharge
destination.
No comments:
Post a Comment