Deans' stroke musings: Cross-education of strength has a positive impact on post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic literature review

Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, February 27, 2016

Cross-education of strength has a positive impact on post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic literature review

I have no fucking clue what this means or how to accomplish this. If we had publicly available stroke protocols this would be easy to figure out. So call up the presidents of our fucking failures of stroke associations and ask why they won't even do this minute task to help stroke survivors.
http://www.maneyonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10749357.2015.1112062

MonikaEhrensberger; DanielSimpson; PatrickBroderick; KennethMonaghan

Author Affilations

Keywords: KeywordsStroke Rehabilitation Cross-education Unilateral strength training Strength transfer

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2015.1112062

Abstract

Background: Since its discovery in 1894 cross-education of strength — a bilateral adaptation after unilateral training – has been shown to be effective in the rehabilitation after one-sided orthopedic injuries. Limited knowledge exists on its application within the rehabilitation after stroke. This review examined the evidence regarding the implication of cross-education in the rehabilitation of the post-stroke hemiplegic patient and its role in motor function recovery.
Methods: Electronic databases were searched by two independent assessors. Studies were included if they described interventions which examined the phenomenon of cross-education of strength from the less-affected to the more-affected side in stroke survivors. Study quality was assessed using the PEDro scale and the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool.
Results: Only two controlled trials met the eligibility criteria. The results of both studies show a clear trend towards cross-educational strength transfer in post-stroke hemiplegic patinets with 31.4% and 45.5% strength increase in the untrained, more-affected dorsiflexor muscle. Results also suggest a possible translation of strength gains towards functional task improvements and motor recovery.
Conclusion: Based on best evidence synthesis guidelines the combination of the results included in this review suggest at least a moderate level of evidence for the application of cross-education of strength in stroke rehabilitation. Following this review it is recommended that additional high quality randomized controlled trials are conducted to further support the findings.