http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00335/full?
- 1Laboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience, Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience, INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- 2National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- 3Faculty of Elementary and Special Education, National University of Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina
- 4Departamento de Estudios Psicológicos, Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia
- 5Universidad Autónoma del Caribe, Barranquilla, Colombia
- 6Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago de Chile, Chile
- 7Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Australian Research Council, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Introduction
The mind-brain association, as conceived in clinical
neuroscience and neuropsychology, is an abstract generalization. In
working with multi-participant samples, behavioral findings stem from
data averages while anatomical results are obtained by transforming
brain images into a standard coordinate space. In both cases, strict
outlier exclusion criteria are applied, so that atypical patterns are
removed from ensuing models. These steps are critical and perhaps
unavoidable to characterize the organ's functional organization with
some degree of external validity. Indeed, thanks to this approach,
replicable associations have been established between damage to
circumscribed regions and impairments of specific functions, including
motor (Zgaljardic et al., 2003), somatosensory (Meyer et al., 2016), socio-cognitive (Gold and Shadlen, 2007; Ibáñez et al., 2010, 2016b; Couto et al., 2013; Baez et al., 2014, 2016b,c; Melloni et al., 2016), interoceptive (Couto et al., 2015; García-Cordero et al., 2016), executive (Rabinovici et al., 2015; Sedeño et al., 2016), linguistic (Ullman, 2008; Cardona et al., 2014; García and Ibáñez, 2014, 2016; Bocanegra et al., 2015; García, 2015; Melloni et al., 2015; García et al., 2016a,b,c; Abrevaya et al., 2017), and pragmatic (Kaplan et al., 1990; Stemmer, 2008) skills.
However, such well established anatomo-clinical links
(and the theoretical views construed around them) are sometimes
challenged by unusual individual cases which do not easily fit
mainstream models in cognitive neuroscience. Such reports include that
of a man who efficiently served as a civil servant although he had
progressively lost roughly 75% of his brain (Feuillet et al., 2007), that of a housewife with only mild motor symptomatology despite primary cerebellar agenesis (Yu et al., 2015), or multiple patients exhibiting considerable restitution of language skills following early left hemispheromotomy (e.g., Hertz-Pannier et al., 2002).
The same is true of studies showing preserved pre- and post-operative
temporal functions in patients with large perisylvian arachnoid cysts (Kunz et al., 1988), although such malformations typically impair various cognitive domains (Wester, 2008).
Cases such as these are valuable because, in their exceptionality, they
invite us to extend our current conceptions of brain organization,
plasticity, and functional compensation, beyond the robust patterns that
emerge in typical, averaged, normalized data.
Building on these premises, we present the remarkable
case of patient CG, who exhibits widespread sparing of sensorimotor,
cognitive, and socio-affective functions despite extensive brain damage
acquired in adulthood. In particular, as shown below, CG's unusual
pattern of preservation was convergently corroborated through
neuropsychological assessment, multiple experimental tasks, neurological
examination, and even naturalistic observations of her daily
functioning. The case could thus prompt new reflections on the
functional organization of various neurocognitive systems.
Great study, where I can get more info about this research?
ReplyDeleteYou email the authors.
Delete