Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, January 24, 2017

A rule-based, dose-finding design for use in stroke rehabilitation research: methodological development

No clue what this is supposed to be saying. 
http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/S0031-9406%2817%2930001-9/abstract

Abstract

Background

Dose-optimisation studies as precursors to clinical trials are rare in stroke rehabilitation.

Objective

To develop a rule-based, dose-finding design for stroke rehabilitation research.

Design

3  + 3 rule-based, dose-finding study. Dose escalation/de-escalation was undertaken according to pre-set rules and a mathematical sequence (modified Fibonacci sequence). The target starting daily dose was 50 repetitions for the first cohort. Adherence was recorded by an electronic counter. At the end of the 2-week training period, the adherence record indicated dose tolerability (adherence to target dose) and the outcome measure indicated dose benefit (10% increase in motor function). The pre-set increment/decrease and checking rules were then applied to set the dose for the subsequent cohort. The process was repeated until pre-set stopping rules were met.

Participants

Participants had a mean age of 68 (range 48–81) years, and were a mean of 70 (range 9–289) months post stroke with moderate upper limb paresis.

Model task

A custom-built model of exercise-based training to enhance ability to open the paretic hand.

Outcome measure

Repetitions per minute of extension/flexion of paretic digits against resistance.

Analysis

Usability of the pre-set rules and whether the maximally tolerated dose was identifiable.

Results

Five cohorts of three participants were involved. Discernibly different doses were set for each subsequent cohort (i.e. 50, 100, 167, 251 and 209 repetitions/day). The maximally tolerated dose for the model training task was 209 repetitions/day.

Conclusions

This dose-finding design is a feasible method for use in stroke rehabilitation research.

No comments:

Post a Comment