Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, January 28, 2017

Measuring Neuroplasticity Associated with Cerebral Palsy Rehabilitation: An MRI based Power Analysis

If they can measure neuroplasticity for CP we can demand our doctors measure it for stroke. How the hell do we even know neuroplasticity is working without something like this? The words used in here are way above my pay grade.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736574816303586
Choose an option to locate/access this article:
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution
Check access

Highlights

Power analysis for imaging-measures of neuroplasticity in cerebral palsy.
Details enrolment numbers needed to detect changes in structural and diffusion MRI.
A range of assumptions tested, including differences in treatment response.
Recommendations made for studies with under 100 participants for improving power.

Abstract

Researchers in the field of child neurology are increasingly looking to supplement clinical trials of motor rehabilitation with neuroimaging in order to better understand the relationship between behavioural training, brain changes, and clinical improvements. Randomised controlled trials are typically accompanied by sample size calculations to detect clinical improvements but, despite the large cost of neuroimaging, not equivalent calculations for concurrently acquired imaging neuroimaging measures of changes in response to intervention. To aid in this regard, a power analysis was conducted for two measures of brain changes that may be indexed in a trial of rehabilitative therapy for cerebral palsy: cortical thickness of the impaired primary sensorimotor cortex, and fractional anisotropy of the impaired, delineated corticospinal tract. Power for measuring fractional anisotropy was assessed for both region-of-interest-seeded and fMRI-seeded diffusion tractography. Taking into account practical limitations, as well as data loss due to behavioural and image-processing issues, estimated required participant numbers were 101, 128 and 59 for cortical thickness, region-of-interest-based tractography, and fMRI-seeded tractography, respectively. These numbers are not adjusted for study attrition. Although these participant numbers may be out of reach of many trials, several options are available to improve statistical power, including careful preparation of participants for scanning using mock simulators, careful consideration of image processing options, and enrolment of as homogeneous a cohort as possible. This work suggests that smaller and moderate sized studies give genuine consideration to harmonising scanning protocols between groups to allow the pooling of data.

No comments:

Post a Comment