Are they measuring results of their interventions and using that to improve?
“What's measured, improves.” So said management legend and author Peter F. Drucker
The second easiest is if you hear the comment 'All strokes are different, all stroke recoveries are different'. This answer means they have a ready excuse for being incompetent by not getting you to 100% recovery.
Do they refer to the protocols they are using and the efficacy of those protocols? Not guidelines, PROTOCOLS.
If you hear about receiving awards from Get With the Guidelines or the Joint Commission. These are both deflections from real information. Neither one of these has the hospital measuring results, they are just having the medical professionals check off that they have gone through the correct processes and procedures. You could have 100% accuracy in the guidelines and still die, success for the doctor, failure for you. Too bad.
Do your medical professionals have a collaborative arrangement with stroke researchers?
Does your doctor write out three prescriptions to OT, PT and ST? All saying the same thing? E.T. - Evaluate and Treat? Meaning your doctor knows zilch about your stroke rehabilitation.
Does your stroke association look anything like this?
Great stroke association
Or is it more like this?
Fucking failures of stroke associations.
Is your doctor doing ANY interventions in the first week?
My 31 ideas on hyperacute therapy I'm going to insist my doctor give me during the first week.
Or these needing a lot more research:
These 177 hyperacute therapies that need more research.
You need absolutely no medical degree to measure this type of incompentency.
No comments:
Post a Comment