Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, March 29, 2023

French Data Reassure on Bivalent COVID Booster and Stroke Risk

Considering the risks of disability or death from COVID-19 I take as many vaccines as available for this. 

French Data Reassure on Bivalent COVID Booster and Stroke Risk

No higher risk for stroke, MI, or pulmonary embolism with Pfizer's updated vaccine

A photo of a healthcare worker holding a vial of Comirnaty bivalent COVID vaccine between their white rubber gloved fingers.

Cardiovascular events were not more likely for recipients of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA bivalent booster compared with the original monovalent booster, according to French researchers.

Their population-based study found no evidence of an increased risk of cardiovascular events at 21 days among the recipients of the bivalent vaccine versus recipients of the monovalent vaccine, including:

  • Ischemic stroke: HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.58-1.27)
  • Hemorrhagic stroke: HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.46-1.61)
  • Myocardial infarction: HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.62-1.36)
  • Pulmonary embolism: HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.49-1.40)
  • All four events combined: HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.69-1.09)

"Our results provide reassurance regarding the continued use of this bivalent vaccine," wrote Marie-Joelle Jabagi, PharmD, PhD, of the EPI-PHARE Scientific Interest Group in Saint-Denis, France, and colleagues in a correspondence published in the New England Journal of Medicineopens in a new tab or window.

The reassuring findings follow a January announcement from the FDA and CDC that the Vaccine Safety Datalink had detected a signalopens in a new tab or window of possible increased risk for ischemic stroke in the 21 days following administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent booster among recipients ages 65 and older.

However, subsequent analyses of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services database, and a preliminary study of the Veterans Affairs database showed no signal for an increased risk with either Pfizer or Moderna's bivalent vaccines, both of which were first authorized late last summeropens in a new tab or window.

Pfizer-BioNTech's global safety database also found no signal for ischemic stroke with their updated booster, nor have surveillance systems from other countries.

For the current study, Jabagi and colleagues used comprehensive data from the French National Health Data System linked to the national COVID-19 vaccination database. All individuals ages 50 and older who had received a booster dose between Oct. 6 and Nov. 9, 2022 -- a time window which captured the only period in which both vaccines were being given in France -- were included in the study.

Of a total of 470,962 vaccine recipients, 20.6% received the monovalent vaccine and 79.4% received the bivalent vaccine. Mean age was 72.6, 53.8% were women, and 75.6% had received three doses of vaccine prior to the study period. Twenty-seven percent had a previous COVID-19 infection.

Common baseline cardiovascular risk factors included hypertension (55.3%), diabetes (15.9%), and dyslipidemia (34.4%). Cardiovascular diseases included coronary heart disease (9.7%), heart failure (3.0%), valvular heart disease (3.0%), occlusive peripheral arterial disease (2.8%), and heart arrhythmia (11.1%). Monovalent and bivalent groups were well-balanced for these characteristics.

The researchers matched each recipient of the monovalent vaccine with up to five randomly sampled recipients of the bivalent vaccine on the same day. They were followed for 21 days.

Those who received other types of COVID-19 vaccines, such as the Moderna vaccine, and those who were less than 90 days out from their last COVID shot were excluded.

  • author['full_name']

    Ingrid Hein is a staff writer for MedPage Today covering infectious disease. She has been a medical reporter for more than a decade. Follow

Disclosures

The researchers reported no conflicts of interest.

Primary Source

New England Journal of Medicine

Source Reference: opens in a new tab or windowJabagi M-J, et al "Stroke, myocardial infarction, and pulmonary embolism after bivalent booster" N Engl J Med 2023; DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2302134.

No comments:

Post a Comment