Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, April 19, 2025

Does Vessel Occlusion Drive the Harmful Effect of Very Early Mobilization in Patients With Ischemic Stroke? A Post Hoc Analysis of AVERT

 You really don't understand the neuronal cascade of death at all, do you? Since you haven't stopped this cascade of death, the first week hundreds of millions to billions of neurons die because of incompetence in not solving this! And you don't understand why you are completely wrong on early mobilization, get out of stroke and find something easier!

Does Vessel Occlusion Drive the Harmful Effect of Very Early Mobilization in Patients With Ischemic Stroke? A Post Hoc Analysis of AVERT

  • Abstract

    BACKGROUND:

    The international trial AVERT (A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial) found that very early mobilization (VEM; commenced <24 hours after stroke) negatively affected functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]). The drivers of this effect remain unclear. One plausible mechanism is that high-dose upright activity worsens cerebral perfusion in patients with cerebral large vessel occlusion (LVO). For this retrospective AVERT substudy, we collected brain imaging from participants from 8 AVERT sites (n=910) to explore the potential relationship between LVO, VEM, and mRS in ischemic stroke. We hypothesized that patients with evidence of LVO would be adversely affected by VEM compared with non-LVO patients.

    METHODS:

    In this post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial, 2 neurologists independently classified patients with ischemic stroke as having LVO via direct (vessel truncation on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging angiography) or indirect evidence (hyperdense artery sign or established infarction of >2/3 of an arterial territory) from brain imaging obtained ≤7 days poststroke. The association between LVO, VEM, and 3- and 12-month mRS was tested using logistic regression, adjusted for age, treatment with thrombolysis, and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

    RESULTS:

    Interrater reliability for LVO signs was high (weighted κ, 0.842 [95% CI, 0.631–0.969]). Of 689 participants (37.2% female; median age, 74.5 [interquartile range, 65.0–81.2] years) included in the primary analysis, 192 (28%) showed direct or indirect evidence of LVO. Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging angiography were available in 179 (26%) of those 689 participants. While LVO was associated with poor mRS (>2) at 3 months (adjusted odds ratio, 2.15 [95% CI, 1.29–3.64]) and 12 months (adjusted odds ratio, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.1–2.84]; P=0.02), there was no significant interaction between VEM, LVO, and mRS (P=0.16).

    CONCLUSIONS:

    We found no evidence that VEM was specifically harmful in patients with LVO. However, as arterial imaging was not consistently obtained before first mobilization, larger prospective studies with standardized measures of LVO are needed to fully address this question.

    REGISTRATION:

    URL: xxx; Unique identifier: ACTRN12606000185561.

    Graphical Abstract

    Get full access to this article

    No comments:

    Post a Comment