Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, October 20, 2025

Differences in Functional Performance and Minimal Detectable Change According to Levels of Ankle Plantar Flexor Spasticity in Patients with Chronic Stroke

Describing spasticity as a problem WITH NO SOLUTION IS ABSOLUTELY FUCKING USELESS RESEARCH! You're fired! You'll want spasticity cured when you are the 1 in 4 per WHO that has a stroke and by then it will be too late for them to change their recovery trajectory!  

Differences in Functional Performance and Minimal Detectable Change According to Levels of Ankle Plantar Flexor Spasticity in Patients with Chronic Stroke


MDPI
Journal of Clinical Medicine (JCM)
October 202514(20):7358
DOI:10.3390/jcm14207358
LicenseCC BY 4.0
Authors:
SeungHeon An
DongGeon Lee
DongMin Park
Kyeongbong Lee

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Ankle plantar flexor spasticity after stroke may limit mobility, especially during turning and multi-directional stepping. Evidence on performance differences and measurement properties across spasticity levels is limited. We examined whether performance on the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC Scale), Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (5xSTS), Figure-of-8 Walk Test (F8WT), and Four-Square Step Test (FSST) differs by spasticity severity, and evaluated test–retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEM), and the minimal detectable change (MDC). 
Methods: In an observational cross-sectional comparative study, 54 individuals more than 6 months post-stroke were classified into three groups by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS = 0, MAS = 1 − 1+, MAS ≥ 2). Participants completed the ABC Scale, 5xSTS, F8WT, and FSST. One-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni adjustment tested group differences. Reliability was quantified using ICC (2,1); SEM and MDC at the 95% confidence level indexed absolute reliability. 
Results: No significant differences were found for the ABC Scale or 5xSTS. F8WT and FSST differed by spasticity level (p < 0.05), with poorer performance in the highest-spasticity group versus no spasticity. ICCs were high across assessments. All SEMs were <20% of test–retest means, and all MDCs were <20% of maximum scores. 
Conclusion: Assessments(Assessments DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO GET SURVIVORS RECOVERED! Are you that blitheringly stupid?) that require directional change detected differences across spasticity levels, whereas balance confidence and repeated sit-to-stand did not. All measures showed acceptable relative and absolute reliability. Findings support selecting outcomes by spasticity severity and using SEM and MDC as reference values when interpreting change in stroke rehabilitation.

No comments:

Post a Comment