A completely worthless study. No mention of looking at any type of objective damage diagnosis.
Is everyone stupid?
http://www.archives-pmr.org/article/S0003-9993%2813%2900587-X/abstract
Abstract
Objective
To identify patient level
characteristics associated with rehabilitation during the acute
post-stroke phase as effective rehabilitation following stroke can
minimize disability and enhance recovery. Initiation of rehabilitation
depends on many clinical and non-clinical factors.
Design
Retrospective
cohort. Generalized estimating equations modeled the likelihood of
rehabilitation during the index hospitalization to account for patient
clusters.
Setting
All VHA facilities
Participants
Total
sample included 9,681 Veterans diagnosed with new stroke discharged
from Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities between October 1,
2006 and September 30, 2008.
Interventions
Not applicable
Main Outcome measures
Receipt of rehabilitation services
Results
Seventy-three
percent of the cohort received some type of rehabilitation. Average age
was 68.7 years and 97.4% were male. After adjustment, stroke patients
with cerebral arteries occlusion were most likely to receive
rehabilitation compared to other stroke types (p<0.0001). Patients
with pre-stroke conditions of metastatic cancer (OR=0.68, p<0.01) and
psychosis (OR=0.90, p=0.04) were less likely to have rehabilitation
while those with hypertension (OR=1.26, p<0.01) and other
neurological disorders (OR=1.29, p<0.0001) were more likely. Compared
to patients admitted from home, patients transferred from a non-VA
hospital (OR=1.40, p<0.01) were more likely to receive
rehabilitation, while patients admitted from extended care (OR=0.59,
p<0.0001) were less likely. Married veterans were less likely to
receive rehabilitation services (OR=0.87, p<0.01) than unmarried
veterans.
Conclusions
Within the VHA, initiating
rehabilitation in the acute phase post-stroke appears to be influenced
by patient clinical characteristics and living circumstances.
No comments:
Post a Comment