Since your doctor is obviously rigorously following all stroke research s/he does not need this review on cognition. But in case s/he doesn't then you could train them on the finer points. Your doctor is really good if they are keeping up with 4931 articles. Send your doctor after what the
computerized rehabilitation protocols are.
http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/26709580
(PMID:26709580)
VA
Boston Healthcare System, Psychology Research Service (Dr Bogdanova and
Mss Yee and Ho); and Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School
of Medicine (Dr Bogdanova and Ms Ho), and Boston University School of
Public Health (Ms Yee), Boston, Massachusetts; Department of
Neuropsychology, JFK-Johnson Rehabilitation Institute, Edison, New
Jersey (Dr Cicerone); and Department of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Edison, New
Jersey (Dr Cicerone).
Type:
Journal Article
Comprehensive
review of the use of computerized treatment as a rehabilitation tool
for attention and executive function in adults (aged 18 years or older)
who suffered an acquired brain injury.Systematic review of empirical
research.Two reviewers independently assessed articles using the
methodological quality criteria of Cicerone et al.
Data extracted included sample size, diagnosis, intervention
information, treatment schedule, assessment methods, and outcome
measures.A literature review (PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Cochrane, PsychINFO,
CINAHL) generated a total of
4931 publications.
Twenty-eight studies using computerized cognitive interventions
targeting attention and executive functions were included in this
review.
In 23 studies, significant improvements in attention and executive
function subsequent to training were reported; in the remaining 5,
promising trends were observed.
Preliminary evidence suggests
improvements in cognitive function following computerized rehabilitation
for acquired brain injury populations including traumatic brain injury
and stroke.
Further studies are needed to address methodological issues (eg, small
sample size, inadequate control groups) and to inform development of
guidelines and standardized protocols.
No comments:
Post a Comment