Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Thursday, January 21, 2016

French Drug Trial Details Murky, Should Not Influence Future Cannabinoid Research

I bet alarmists will still use this to stop medical marijuana.
http://www.alphagalileo.org/ViewItem.aspx?ItemId=160210&CultureCode=en
Contrary to initial reports, the drug tested on paid volunteers in a French study, which resulted in one death and five hospitalizations, did not contain cannabis or cannabinoids. The drug, an FAAH inhibitor manufactured by the Portuguese company Bial, was instead designed to act upon the human endocannabinoid system as a potential painkiller and treatment for anxiety. Beyond that, very little information is publicly known and as such, no conclusions can be drawn about the safety or efficacy related to future cannabis and cannabinoid research.

"Without adequate information it is impossible to advance any realistic theory about causes of toxicity," says Daniele Piomelli, PhD, Louise Turner Arnold Chair in Neurosciences and Professor, Anatomy & Neurobiology University of California-Irvine, School of Medicine, and Editor-in-Chief of Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research. "Several structurally different FAAH inhibitors have been previously tested for human safety in rigorous Phase 1 clinical trials. These include compounds from Sanofi, Pfizer, Merck, Johnson and Johnson, and others. All these FAAH inhibitors were shown to be safe in humans."

The human safety of multiple FAAH inhibitors suggests that toxicity of the Bial compound is unlikely to be a 'class effect'-in other words, it is unlikely to be due to the interaction of the Bial compound with FAAH.

"It is more probable that the Bial compound interacts with another, as yet unknown protein that is responsible for the observed toxicity, or that a toxic impurity was present in the test drug," continues Dr. Piomelli. "Of course, while we can tentatively exclude a class effect at this point, we cannot pin-point which other target might be responsible for the toxicity of the Bial compound."
http://www.liebertpub.com/can

No comments:

Post a Comment