We need to totally get neurologists out of the picture. They do a lousy job of detecting young adult strokes. We need 100% accuracy. How will we get there?
Pediatric Stroke Often Misdiagnosed, Treatment Delayed
Doctors tell boy, 15, he had a migraine after rugby tackle - but he was actually suffering a paralyzing stroke which nearly killed him
Factors Associated With Misdiagnosis of Acute Stroke in Young Adults
Dr. Watson maybe. Or these?
Hats off to Helmet of Hope - stroke diagnosis in 30 seconds
Microwave Imaging for Brain Stroke Detection and Monitoring using High Performance Computing in 94 seconds
New Device Quickly Assesses Brain Bleeding in Head Injuries - 5-10 minutes
Or don't you even know about these?
Visual assessment of diffusion weighted imaging infarct volume lacks accuracy and reliability
Abstract
Purpose
The DAWN trial (Diffusion weighted imaging or CT perfusion Assessment
with clinical mismatch in the triage of Wake-up and late presenting
strokes undergoing Neurointervention with Trevo) has demonstrated the
benefits of thrombectomy in patients with unknown or late onset strokes,
using automated software (RAPID) for measurement of infarct volume.
Because RAPID is not available in all centers, we aimed to assess the
accuracy and repeatability of visual infarct volume estimation by
clinicians and the consequences for thrombectomy decisions based on the
DAWN criteria.
Materials and methods
18 physicians, who routinely depend on MRI for acute stroke imaging,
assessed 32 MR scans selected from a prospective databaseover two
independent sessions. Raters were asked to visually estimate the
diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) infarct volume for each case.
Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the estimated volumes were
compared with the available RAPID measurements for various volume
cut-off points. Thrombectomy decisions based on DAWN criteria with RAPID
measurements and raters’ visual estimates were compared. Inter-rater
and intra-rater agreement was measured using kappa statistics.
Results
The mean accuracy of raters was <90% for all volume cut-points.
Inter-rater agreement was below substantial for each DWI infarct volume
cut-off points. Intra-rater agreement was substantial for 55–83% of
raters, depending on the selected cut-off points. Applying DAWN criteria
with visual estimates instead of RAPID measurements led to 19%
erroneous thrombectomy decisions, and showed a lack of reproducibility.
Conclusion
The visual assessment of DWI infarct volume lacks accuracy and
repeatability, and could lead to a significant number of erroneous
decisions when applying the DAWN criteria.
No comments:
Post a Comment