Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, August 20, 2019

Clinical feasibility of Xbox Kinect™ training for stroke rehabilitation: A single-blind randomized controlled pilot study

You mean all this earlier research was not enough to write stroke protocols on this? That you had to do your own research?

  • Kinect (33 posts back to June 2012)
  • Xbox (5 posts back to June 2012)

 

Clinical feasibility of Xbox Kinect™ training for stroke rehabilitation: A single-blind randomized controlled pilot study

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (formerly the Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine) , Volume 49(1) , Pgs. 22-29.

NARIC Accession Number: J81377.  What's this?
ISSN: 1650-1977.
Author(s): Turkbey, Tuba A.; Kutlay, Sehim; Gok, Haydar.
Publication Year: 2017.
Number of Pages: 8.
Abstract: Study evaluated the feasibility and safety of Xbox Kinect™ training of the upper extremity in subacute stroke rehabilitation. Twenty patients with stroke were randomly assigned to 2 groups: the control group received conventional therapy and the experimental group received additional Xbox Kinect training for 20 sessions. Feasibility and safety were evaluated by treatment attendance rate, patient feedback, proportion of adverse events, and the Borg Scale (Borg CR10). Data for 19 patients were analyzed. The treatment attendance ratio for total training time and training time/session was 87 percent and 90 percent, respectively. All participants reported that training with the Xbox Kinect was enjoyable and beneficial. No serious adverse events occurred. Fatigue was the most common adverse event. The mean Borg CR10 score was 7.80, reflecting a very high level of fatigue. The experimental group showed significantly greater improvement than the control group in the Box and Blocks Test, Wolf Motor Function Test, and Brunnstrom motor recovery stages. Xbox Kinect training appears feasible and safe in upper extremity rehabilitation after stroke. It could enhance motor and functional recovery of the affected upper extremity as an adjunctive method.
Descriptor Terms: COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, DEXTERITY, FEASIBILITY STUDIES, LIMBS, MOTOR SKILLS, REHABILITATION TECHNOLOGY, SAFETY, STROKE, THERAPEUTIC TRAINING.


Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Get this Document: https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/abstract/10.2340/16501977-2183.

Citation: Turkbey, Tuba A., Kutlay, Sehim, Gok, Haydar. (2017). Clinical feasibility of Xbox Kinect™ training for stroke rehabilitation: A single-blind randomized controlled pilot study.  Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (formerly the Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine) , 49(1), Pgs. 22-29. Retrieved 8/20/2019, from REHABDATA database.

No comments:

Post a Comment