Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, July 12, 2025

Brain Changes in Stroke Patients During Rehabilitation: A Longitudinal Study

You incompetently didn't tie how this knowledge gets survivors recovered 100%! That is the only goal in stroke, and you completely failed at it! You're fired!

 Brain Changes in Stroke Patients During Rehabilitation: A Longitudinal Study


Xuejin  CaoXuejin Cao1Yanli  LiuYanli Liu2Jia  QuanJia Quan1Hengrui  ZhouHengrui Zhou1Wei  WangWei Wang2Zan  WangZan Wang2Shenghong  JuShenghong Ju2Yuancheng  WangYuancheng Wang2Yijing  GuoYijing Guo3*Hongxing  WangHongxing Wang2*
  • 1Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
  • 2Southeast University Zhongda Hospital, Nanjing, China
  • 3Department of Neurology, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: 

    Temporal changes in brain structure and function following rehabilitation, and their relationship with positive recovery in stroke patients experiencing hemiplegia, remain unclear. This study used multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to investigate the longitudinal changes in the brains of stroke patients with good outcomes after motor rehabilitation 

    Methods: 

    Eight subcortical ischemic stroke patients with hemiplegia were enrolled. Multimodal MRI data and clinical assessments were collected in the stable post-acute period and at a 3-month followup. Functional connectivity (FC) was calculated for motor-related regions of interest (ROIs) based on functional MRI data. Gray matter volumes (GMVs) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters were analyzed to evaluate the temporal changes during recovery.

    Results: Compared with initial scans, follow-up scans revealed FC changes between several brain regions, e.g., FC increased between the ipsilesional thalamus and the contralesional middle temporal gyrus (MTG). Increased GMV was observed in the contralesional MTG, while GMV decreased in the contralesional cerebellum, correlating with Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) scores at followup. 

    Conclusions: The findings suggest that MTG is a key area for neuronal activation and functional reconstruction in stroke patients during motor recovery. These results deepen our understanding of the imaging manifestations of structural and functional neural remodeling during rehabilitation.(But nothing here gets survivors recovered, you failed at stroke research!)

    Keywords: Stroke, Hemiplegia, motor recovery, multimodal MRI, longitudinal study

    Received: 27 May 2025; Accepted: 11 Jul 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Cao, Liu, Quan, Zhou, Wang, Wang, Ju, Wang, Guo and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Yijing Guo, Department of Neurology, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
    Hongxing Wang, Southeast University Zhongda Hospital, Nanjing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


    No comments:

    Post a Comment