Using an Interprofessional Learning Simulation to Support Integrated Stroke Care Transitions

 

This is the whole problem in stroke enumerated in one word; 'care'; NOT RECOVERY!

If your hospital is touting 'care' it means they are a failure because they are delivering 'care'; NOT RECOVERY! I would never go to a failed hospital!

YOU have to get involved and change this failure mindset of 'care' to 100% RECOVERY! Survivors want RECOVERY, NOT 'CARE'!

I see nothing here that states going for 100% recovery! You need to create EXACT PROTOCOLS FOR THAT!

ASK SURVIVORS WHAT THEY WANT, THEY'LL NEVER RESPOND 'CARE'! This tyranny of low expectations has to be completely rooted out of any stroke conversation! I wouldn't go there because of such incompetency as not having 100% recovery protocols!

RECOVERY IS THE ONLY GOAL IN STROKE! 

GET THERE!'

Using an Interprofessional Learning Simulation to Support Integrated Stroke Care Transitions

• August 2025
• International Journal of Integrated Care 25(S2):162

DOI:10.5334/ijic.NACIC24162

• License
• CC BY 4.0

Authors:

Sherry Espin

Background: 

Older adults living with stroke and other comorbidities often experience care(NOT RECOVERY!) transitions across multiple health sectors. Managing stroke in addition to other comorbidities requires the expertise of an interprofessional stroke-specific team. A learning simulation tool can develop competencies for interprofessional integrated stroke care(NOT RECOVERY!) to supportcare(NOT RECOVERY!) quality and patient safety. Findings from this work are relevant to faculty/educators in health professions education programs and for clinicians in stroke care(NOT RECOVERY!)settings. The simulation tool is freely accessible and can be adapted to the educational context for use with interprofessional stroke teams or to use as an interprofessional education activity. 

Approach: 

Guided by the INACSL Standards of Best Practice for simulation development, researchers and expert stroke clinicians co-designed the simulation scenario. We engaged a team of researchers and interprofessional front-line stroke clinicians from an academic teaching hospital in designing the simulation case scenarios to ensure the relevancy to current practice. This included developing the script for the video scenes which included an actor patient role. The case incorporated both stroke patient and family caregiver perspectives.Learning objectives were informed by experiential and reflective learning theories, and the Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CPSI) Safety Competencies. Multiple types of fidelity (e.g., physical environment, conceptual, psychological) were incorporated to create a realistic case scenario representing current best practices for stroke and care(NOT RECOVERY!) transitions. The simulation is intentionally focused on managing an older stroke survivor complex trajectory through two formal integrated care(NOT RECOVERY!) transitions from hospital to home in the community.The simulation incorporates concepts related to current system-level changes and existing integrated models of stroke care(NOT RECOVERY!) in Ontario, Canada. Integrated care(NOT RECOVERY!) models are people-centered approaches to address fragmented care(NOT RECOVERY!) systems to improve quality of care(NOT RECOVERY!), through the coordination of people care(NOT RECOVERY!) needs across services, providers, andsettings. The simulation promotes active learning, problem-solving, and critical thinking skills. The content incorporates Canadian Best Practices for Stroke care(NOT RECOVERY!), CPSI Safety Competencies for Health Professionals, the International Foundation of Integrated care(NOT RECOVERY!) Pillars, and the Model for Improvement quality framework. 

Results: 

This innovative open-access simulation features two video-recorded scenes featuring an interprofessional integrated approach to stroke care(NOT RECOVERY!) across two care(NOT RECOVERY!) transitions from ) acute care(NOT RECOVERY!) to a rehabilitation hospital, and 2) a rehabilitation hospital back to the patient home in the community. The simulation profiles the specific knowledge and skills of the interprofessional team members roles for stroke care(NOT RECOVERY!). Further, the simulation intentionally highlights how the patient is actively engaged as a member of the interprofessional integrated stroke team. The video simulation has been used in the context of undergraduate/graduate courses with further uptake that can be considered in practice contexts such as stroke rehabilitation programs to enhance safe, quality integrated care(NOT RECOVERY!) transitions. Results from the in-class evaluation of the video simulation focusing on the student experiences of the debrief discussions will be presented. Implications: This simulation can be used in a variety of contexts to support learning about interprofessional integrated stroke care(NOT RECOVERY!) in both academic and practice settings. The series of debriefing questions can be adapted for use within specific contexts. To date, there has been some uptake in hospital stroke teams. 

Next Steps: 

We are currently building on this simulation to co-design and experiential learning initiative to inform further content on community-based integrated stroke care(NOT RECOVERY!). In this work we are engaging stroke community members including health and social care(NOT RECOVERY!) providers, stroke patients, family caregivers, undergraduate and graduate students in co-developing the content and pedagogical approaches.