Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Prehospital tranexamic acid in trauma and traumatic brain injury: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized comparative evidence

 Your competent? doctor put together a protocol on this years ago, right? NO? 

Do you prefer your doctor, hospital and board of director's incompetence NOT KNOWING? OR NOT DOING? Your choice; let them be incompetent or demand action!

Prehospital tranexamic acid in trauma and traumatic brain injury: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized comparative evidence

We’re sharing this article early to provide faster access to peer-reviewed, accepted research. It is citable and carries a permanent DOI. This version is subject to further edits and will be replaced automatically by the final Version of Record. All legal disclaimers apply.

Abstract

Background

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is commonly used in trauma care to decrease bleeding, but its effectiveness and safety in prehospital settings, notably in traumatic brain injury (TBI), remain controversial. This review aimed to systematically evaluate the evidence on prehospital tranexamic acid (TXA) use in trauma and traumatic brain injury (TBI), with quantitative meta-analysis restricted to randomized comparative evidence and non-randomized evidence summarized narratively.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review with quantitative meta-analysis restricted to independent randomized comparative studies evaluating prehospital TXA versus placebo, usual care, or no TXA. Observational studies, secondary analyses, and survey studies were summarized separately and were not pooled with randomized trials in the primary efficacy or safety meta-analysis. outcomes included mortality (28/30-day, in-hospital), thromboembolic events, seizures, and neurological consequences. Risk of bias was evaluated using Cochrane risk of bias tools for randomized controlled trials (RoB2) and non-randomized studies by Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I).

Results

Twenty-one reports met the broad review criteria. The RCT-only analysis of 28- or 30-day mortality included three independent parent randomized trials: PATCH-Trauma/Gruen et al. 2023, STAAMP/Guyette et al. 2021, and ROC-TXA/Rowell et al. 2020. Prehospital TXA was associated with lower 28- or 30-day mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68–0.95). The TBI mortality result was derived solely from ROC-TXA/Rowell et al. 2020 and was therefore a single-study estimate rather than a pooled estimate (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.64–1.20). In-hospital mortality was reported only by STAAMP/Guyette et al. 2021 and was also a single-study estimate (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.57–1.33). No statistically significant increase in thromboembolic events or seizures was demonstrated. However, the DVT and PE point estimates were above the null, and their wide confidence intervals did not exclude a clinically relevant increase in thromboembolic risk.

Conclusion

Prehospital TXA may reduce 28- or 30-day mortality in selected broader trauma populations, particularly among patients at risk of hemorrhage. No statistically significant increase in thromboembolic events or seizures was demonstrated; however, clinically relevant thromboembolic harm cannot be excluded because the DVT and PE point estimates were above the null, and the confidence intervals were wide.

No comments:

Post a Comment