I would prefer that you interpret this in a useful way. Creating stroke rehab protocols.
Interpreting Prefrontal Recruitment During Walking After Stroke: Influence of Individual Differences in Mobility and Cognitive Function
- 1Brain Rehabilitation Research Center (BRRC), Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville, FL, United States
- 2Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- 3Brooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, FL, United States
- 4Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- 5Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- 6Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- 7Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- 8Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville, FL, United States
Methods: Thirty-three adults with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis performed three tasks: typical walking at preferred speed (Walk), serial-7 subtraction (Serial7), and walking combined with serial-7 subtraction (Dual-Task). Prefrontal recruitment was measured with fNIRS and quantified as the change in oxygenated hemoglobin concentration (ΔO2Hb) between resting and active periods for each task. Spatiotemporal gait parameters were measured on an electronic walkway. Stepwise regression was used to assess how prefrontal recruitment was affected by individual differences including age, sex, stroke region, injured hemisphere, stroke chronicity, 10-meter walking speed, balance confidence measured by Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale, sensorimotor impairment measured by Fugl-Meyer Assessment, and cognitive function measured by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).
Results: For Walk, poor balance confidence (ABC Scale score) significantly predicted greater prefrontal recruitment (ΔO2Hb; R2 = 0.25, p = 0.003). For Dual-Task, poor cognitive function (MMSE score) significantly predicted lower prefrontal recruitment (ΔO2Hb; R2 = 0.25, p = 0.002).
Conclusions: Poor mobility function predicted higher prefrontal recruitment during typical walking, consistent with compensatory over-recruitment. Poor cognitive function predicted lower prefrontal recruitment during dual-task walking, consistent with a recruitment ceiling effect. These findings indicate that interpretation of prefrontal recruitment should carefully consider the characteristics of the person and demands of the task.
No comments:
Post a Comment