Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Thursday, June 4, 2020

Access to rehabilitation for patients with stroke in Australia

Really, you think access is the most important item that survivors care about? NO YOU ARE WRONG, TRY 100% RECOVERY. And I'm sure the goal-directed treatment is goals the therapist and doctor set, NOT THE SURVIVOR.  Because you have to make sure the tyranny of low expectations can be met with the available therapy.  You really would hate for stroke survivors to realize that their stroke medical 'professionals' know absolutely nothing about 100% recovery.

Access to rehabilitation for patients with stroke in Australia

Elizabeth A Lynch, Shylie Mackintosh, Julie A Luker and Susan L Hillier
Med J Aust 2019; 210 (1): 21-26. || doi: 10.5694/mja2.12034
Published online: 14 January 2019






Abstract

Objective: To identify factors associated with receiving acute goal‐directed treatment, being assessed for ongoing rehabilitation, and receiving post‐acute rehabilitation after having a stroke.
Design: Retrospective analysis of National Stroke Audit data for patients with acute stroke treated at Australian hospitals during 1 September 2014 – 28 February 2015.
Setting, participants: 112 Australian hospitals that admit adults with acute stroke.
Main outcomes: Associations between patient‐related and organisational factors and the provision of rehabilitation interventions.
Results: Data for 3462 patients were eligible for analysis; their median age was 74 years, 1962 (57%) were men, and 2470 (71%) had received care(NOT RESULTS?) in a stroke unit. 2505 patients (72%) received goal‐directed treatment during their acute admission; it was not provided to 364 patients (10.5%) who were responsive, had not fully recovered, and did not refuse treatment. Factors associated with higher odds of receiving goal‐directed treatment included goal‐setting with the patient and their family (odds ratio [OR], 6.75; 95% CI, 5.07–8.90) and receiving care in a stroke unit (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.61–2.70). 1358 patients (39%) underwent further rehabilitation after discharge from acute care; factors associated with receiving post‐acute rehabilitation included care in a stroke unit (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.34–2.22) and having an arm or speech deficit. Dementia was associated with lower odds of receiving acute goal‐directed treatment (OR, 0.49; 95%, 0.33–0.73) and post‐acute rehabilitation (OR, 0.43; 95%, 0.30–0.61).
Conclusions: Access to stroke units and to early and ongoing rehabilitation for patients after stroke can be improved in Australia, both to optimise outcomes and to reduce the burden of care on underresourced community and primary care providers.





No comments:

Post a Comment