Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, July 30, 2022

Tree climbing

 I used to be quite good at this. This is the first tree I've been on in the past 16 years, With better landing underneath I would have walked further onto the branch, it was only two feet above the ground.



Somerset stroke survivor calls for thrombectomy access nationwide

NOT GOOD ENOUGH! This is only the first step to full recovery. With no protocols to stop the 5 causes of the neuronal cascade of death in the first days you'll still kill off billions of neurons, vastly reducing your rehab chances to succeed in recovery.

Somerset stroke survivor calls for thrombectomy access nationwide

Linda BealeImage source, Linda Beale
Image caption,
Linda Beale was treated at Southmead Hospital in Bristol

A woman whose life was saved by a stroke procedure is backing calls by the Stroke Association to have it made available to patients nationwide.

Linda Beale, from Chilcompton, Somerset, had a thrombectomy, where the clot in her brain was physically pulled out rather than dissolved with drugs.

The goal of the NHS is to treat 10% of all strokes with method but only 28% of that target has been reached.

NHS England said it was working to improve stroke treatment services.

Ms Beale had her stroke in April 2018 and collapsed at work.

She was rushed to the Royal United Hospital in Bath and injected with clot-dissolving drugs and was then taken to Southmead Hospital in Bristol.

"The doctor told me it could cause a bleed on my brain, but if I didn't I would be very disabled," she said.

A wire was inserted into her brain via the groin and the clot was pulled out, immediately returning movement to Ms Beale.

"The doctor asked me if I could raise my left leg, I raised it and was so relieved to get movement back.

Linda and Steve BealeImage source, Linda Beale
Image caption,
Ms Beale completed the Race for Life in Bath just four months after her stroke

"It's saved the NHS money to give me the thrombectomy.

"I didn't have to have any occupational therapy, I don't need carers and I can contribute to society. We all deserve to have the same chance," she said.

Thrombectomies are not suitable for all strokes, only ones with clots in arteries big enough to fit the wire into.

The Stroke Association is calling on the government to make it available nationwide 24/7.

"It's shocking that so many patients are missing out and being saddled with unnecessary disability," said Jacqui Cuthbert from the charity.

An NHS spokesperson said: "Teams across the country have continued to improve stroke prevention and treatment services - including access to thrombectomy - in line with our long term plan ambitions to save more lives.

"We are supporting local clinicians to deliver 24/7 access to thrombectomy, clot-busting drugs and other life-saving specialist stroke services in every part of the country."

Friday, July 29, 2022

Observational Study of Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Severe Upper Limb Impairment After Stroke

 And you blithering idiots somehow think that biomarkers are of any use at all in getting survivors recovered? All they are good for is predicting failure to recover, and you didn't know that? I stand by my opinion on that. What's your excuse for useless research?

Observational Study of Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Severe Upper Limb Impairment After Stroke

Kathryn S. Hayward, Jennifer K. Ferris, Keith R. Lohse, Michael R. Borich, Alexandra Borstad, Jessica M. Cassidy, Steven C. Cramer, Sean P. Dukelow, Sonja E. Findlater, Rachel L. Hawe, Sook-Lei Liew, Jason L. Neva, Jill C. Stewart, Lara A. Boyd

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Abstract

Background and Objectives It is difficult to predict poststroke outcome for individuals with severe motor impairment because both clinical tests and corticospinal tract (CST) microstructure may not reliably indicate severe motor impairment. Here, we test whether imaging biomarkers beyond the CST relate to severe upper limb (UL) impairment poststroke by evaluating white matter microstructure in the corpus callosum (CC). In an international, multisite hypothesis-generating observational study, we determined if (1) CST asymmetry index (CST-AI) can differentiate between individuals with mild-moderate and severe UL impairment and (2) CC biomarkers relate to UL impairment within individuals with severe impairment poststroke. We hypothesized that CST-AI would differentiate between mild-moderate and severe impairment, but CC microstructure would relate to motor outcome for individuals with severe UL impairment.

Methods Seven cohorts with individual diffusion imaging and motor impairment (Fugl-Meyer Upper Limb) data were pooled. Hand-drawn regions-of-interest were used to seed probabilistic tractography for CST (ipsilesional/contralesional) and CC (prefrontal/premotor/motor/sensory/posterior) tracts. Our main imaging measure was mean fractional anisotropy. Linear mixed-effects regression explored relationships between candidate biomarkers and motor impairment, controlling for observations nested within cohorts, as well as age, sex, time poststroke, and lesion volume.

Results Data from 110 individuals (30 with mild-moderate and 80 with severe motor impairment) were included. In the full sample, greater CST-AI (i.e., lower fractional anisotropy in the ipsilesional hemisphere, p < 0.001) and larger lesion volume (p = 0.139) were negatively related to impairment. In the severe subgroup, CST-AI was not reliably associated with impairment across models. Instead, lesion volume and CC microstructure explained impairment in the severe group beyond CST-AI (p's < 0.010).

Discussion Within a large cohort of individuals with severe UL impairment, CC microstructure related to motor outcome poststroke. Our findings demonstrate that CST microstructure does relate to UL outcome across the full range of motor impairment but was not reliably associated within the severe subgroup. Therefore, CC microstructure may provide a promising biomarker for severe UL outcome poststroke, which may advance our ability to predict recovery in individuals with severe motor impairment after stroke.

Glossary

AIC=
Akaike's Information Criterion;
BET=
Brain Extraction Tool;
CC=
corpus callosum;
CST=
corticospinal tract;
CST-AI=
CST asymmetry index;
DTI=
diffusion tensor imaging;
FA=
fractional anisotropy;
FM-UL=
Fugl-Meyer UL;
FSL=
FMRIB's Software Library;
MEP−=
motor evoked potential negative;
MEP+=
motor evoked potential positive;
ROIs=
regions of interest;
SRRR=
Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable;
UL=
upper limb

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.

  • * These authors contributed equally as first authors.

  • Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Brad Worrall, MD, MSc.

Wednesday, July 27, 2022

Association Between Change in Leisure-Time Physical Activity During the Postretirement Period and Incident Stroke

FYI.

Association Between Change in Leisure-Time Physical Activity During the Postretirement Period and Incident Stroke

Xingxing Li, Shuangyan Liu, Xuanwen Mu, Hui Gao, Yunhua Zi, Handong Yang, Xiaomin Zhang, Meian He, Kuai Yu

Abstract

Background and Objectives To investigate the association of change in leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) occurring during the postretirement period with incident stroke.

Methods The current study enrolled 12,644 retired workers from the Dongfeng-Tongji cohort from April to October 2013. The change in LTPA was categorized as follows, according to whether the LTPA time met the WHO recommended minimum (at least 150 minutes per week): (1) stayed inactive at both surveys; (2) stayed inactive at the 2008 survey but became active at the 2013 survey; (3) stayed active at the 2008 survey but became inactive at the 2013 survey; (4) stayed active at both surveys. We used multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models to examine the association between change in LTPA and the risk of incident stroke.

Results During 70,437 person-years of follow-up, we documented 549 incident stroke cases, including 434 incident ischemic stroke cases and 115 incident hemorrhagic stroke (HS) cases. Compared with participants who stayed active at both the 2008 and 2013 surveys, those who were active at the 2008 survey but became inactive at the 2013 survey had significantly higher risks of incident total stroke (hazard ratio [HR] 1.30, 95% CI 1.03, 1.65) and HS (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.51, 3.63). When stratified by body mass index (BMI) categories, a significant elevated risk of total stroke was seen among overweight participants who stayed active at the 2008 survey but became inactive at the 2013 survey (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.20, 2.27). The risk of incident stroke decreased with increasing LTPA levels between the 2 surveys (HR of per 150 min/wk increase of LTPA: HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94, 1.00). In addition, we found that compared with participants who maintained their BMI and stayed active at both the 2008 and 2013 surveys, those who were inactive at both points or who became inactive had higher risks of stroke (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.09, 4.15; HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.07, 2.08, respectively).

Discussion Among Chinese older adults, increasing LTPA levels during the postretirement period was associated with a lower risk of incident stroke. Retired individuals should be encouraged to participate in LTPA more frequently to lessen future risk of incident stroke.

Glossary

AHA=
American Heart Association;
BMI=
body mass index;
CHD=
coronary heart disease;
DFTG=
Dongfeng-Tongji;
LTPA=
leisure-time physical activity;
HR=
hazard ratio;
HS=
hemorrhagic stroke;
ICD-10=
International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision;
IS=
ischemic stroke;
PA=
physical activity;
RCS=
restricted cubic spline

Embedded Image

Stroke is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide, accounting for 6.37 million premature deaths in 2019.1,2 Persuasive evidence has showed that greater participation in leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) could effectively reduce stroke risk,3,-,6 but most previous studies conducted only a single assessment of LTPA, usually at baseline.7,-,10 As individuals might change their LTPA patterns over time,11,12 especially after retirement, which has been considered as a critical turning point in life,13,14 repeat measurements of LTPA would provide more accurate assessment in examination of its association with subsequent risk of stroke.

To date, 3 prospective studies have investigated the association between change in LTPA and incident stroke, but they reported inconclusive findings. One study found that among 61,256 retired American women, even those not meeting the American Heart Association (AHA) recommendations of 150 minutes moderate or 75 minutes vigorous physical activity (PA) per week at baseline, those who transitioned to meet such recommendations after 10 years experienced a 21% lower risk of stroke compared with those being persistently inactive.15 Another study of 72,488 US women also showed that compared with women reporting less than 1 h/wk of PA in both 1980 and 1986 visits, those maintaining 4 h/wk of PA had a 54% lower risk of ischemic stroke (IS).16 However, a study of 39,315 US women showed that compared with women reporting less than 2 h/wk of walking at baseline and the follow-up visit after 3 years, those who maintained over 2 h/wk of walking did not gain significant stroke prevention benefit.7 Besides the inconsistent findings, these studies were all limited to women from developed countries; data on men or populations from developing countries are lacking. Furthermore, to our knowledge, the joint association of the change in LTPA and body weight indicators such as body mass index (BMI) with incident stroke has not been well-explored.

To narrow the knowledge gap, we conducted a prospective study of 12,644 retired men and women in China to examine the association between change in LTPA occurring during the postretirement period and subsequent risk of stroke.

More at link.

Long-Term Effects of Mirror Therapy on Upper Extremity Function and Use in Persons With Poststroke Hemiparesis

Now if we could just get EXACT PROTOCOLS written up, survivors could use them to recover.  But obviously no one fucking cares about helping survivors since nothing is ever done for them. 

Long-Term Effects of Mirror Therapy on Upper Extremity Function and Use in Persons With Poststroke Hemiparesis

The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2022, Vol. 76(Supplement_1), 7610505053p1.

Date Presented 04/01/2022

This study investigated the long-term effects of movement-based and task-based mirror therapy in people with poststroke hemiparesis. This follow-up study added a third time point to a previous randomized controlled trial and found significant long-term improvements in occupational performance, indicating maintained benefits of mirror therapy and some significant benefits in the task-based group, or benefits of purposeful action. However, study limitations inhibit drawing meaningful applications to the field of OT.

Primary Author and Speaker: Sara Corning

Additional Authors and Speakers: Mary Hildebrand

PURPOSE: The purpose of this research is to investigate the long-term effects on upper extremity function using movement-based mirror therapy (MBMT) and task-based mirror therapy (TBMT) in persons with post-stroke hemiparesis. This is an important population, given that stroke is the leading cause of disability in the US and hemiparesis is a common condition for stroke survivors that affects their upper extremity function. In occupational therapy, mirror therapy (MT) is widely supported in the literature as an effective intervention for persons with post-stroke hemiparesis. However, there are mixed results regarding whether TBMT or MBMT protocols are more effective and a gap in the literature regarding the long-term effects of MT. This indicates a need for further research to better inform OT practitioners about the effectiveness of this intervention.

DESIGN/METHOD: This is a follow-up study to a previously conducted randomized control trial involving 17 participants who were at least 6 months post-stroke. This study recruited from the previous participants and added a third time point to the previous pre/post data collection points. There were 10 participants who consented to take part in a one-time assessment that was conducted virtually via Zoom. The quantitative assessments included were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) to assess upper extremity function, the 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-36) to assess overall health, and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) to assess self-report of occupational performance and satisfaction. Additionally, guiding questions were asked to explore participants’ perspectives during the MT interventions. Data was analyzed using SPSS to determine if there were significant differences between or within group.

RESULTS: There were significant improvements on the COPM performance scores and satisfaction scores from pre-test to post-test and from pre-test to follow-up; there was no significance between the post-test and follow up. This indicates that the benefits from MT did not continue to improve but that they were maintained long-term. There were significant differences in the TBMT and MBMT scores for the SF-36 sub-sections for general mental health, general health perceptions, and role limitations due to emotional health, with TBMT having more positive outcomes, indicating that engagement in purposeful activities appeared to have a more positive impact on participants’ perceptions of mental and emotional health compared to engagement in rote movements or exercises. The primary theme that emerged from the qualitative data, when participants were asked about use of their affected arm/hand, was that MT Increased Use of the Hand. These comments provide support to the theory that MT counteracts learned nonuse. Limitations of this study are substantial and include a very small sample size, widely varying times for participants post-stroke, and confounding factors such as participation in other therapies and other health problems.

CONCLUSION: There may be long term benefits of MT interventions, but our results are inconclusive due to many confounding factors. In addition, there is still no conclusive evidence that TMBT is significantly more effective than MBMT.

IMPACT STATEMENT: This study is important to indicate the potential support of task-based interventions, as well as the potential long-term benefits of MT. However, due to limitations in the study, there is a need for further research into the effectiveness of different types of MT interventions and the long-term effects of these protocols.

References

Arya, K. N., Pandian, S., Kumar, D., & Puri, V. (2015). Task-based mirror therapy augmenting motor recovery in poststroke hemiparesis: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 24(8), 1738-1748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.03.026

Heidt, A. (2019). Effects of task-based mirror therapy on proximal joints in stroke patients with hemiparesis [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. MGH Institute of Health Professions.

Thieme, H., Morkisch, N., Mehrholz, J., Pohl, M., Behrens, J., Borgetto, B., & Dohle, C. (2018). Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008449.pub3

Evaluating Implementation Strategies and Outcomes in Postacute Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review

My god, no one understands what survivors want. 100% recovery.  Are you that fucking stupid?

Evaluating Implementation Strategies and Outcomes in Postacute Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review

The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2022, Vol. 76(Supplement_1), 7610510236p1.

Date Presented 04/02/2022

This research describes implementation strategies and outcomes commonly leveraged to support evidence implementation in adult stroke rehabilitation. Presenters will share findings from their scoping review that examined the effectiveness of implementation strategies with practitioners in stroke rehabilitation settings. This study addresses the research priority concerning the need to progress beyond implementation barriers to examining implementation strategies to overcome them.

Primary Author and Speaker: James Edward Murrell

Additional Authors and Speakers: Janell Pisegna, Lisa Juckett

BACKGROUND: Every year, millions of people worldwide experience a stroke. Stroke survivors expect occupational therapy practitioners to utilize evidence-based practice to provide the highest quality, cost-efficient services. The benefits of OT in stroke rehabilitation have been well-established for decades. However, practitioners can experience complex barriers when implementing EBP. Moreover, while identifying these barriers is a necessary precursor to optimizing implementation, it remains unclear what strategies have been used to promote effective implementation in the real-world context. This scoping review aimed to answer the following two research questions: What implementation strategies have occupational therapy researchers used to support the uptake of evidence-based interventions and assessments in stroke rehabilitation? And what outcomes have been measured to determine the effectiveness of implementation strategies in stroke rehabilitation? Addressing these questions will point OT practitioners and researchers towards strategies that may support evidence implementation in stroke rehabilitation.

DESIGN: The scoping review methodology was guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review reporting recommendation. Studies were eligible for inclusion in the review if they were published between Jan 2000–Jan 2020, examined the implementation of interventions or assessments, had a target population of adult (19 years and older) stroke survivors, included occupational therapy practitioners, and were relevant to physical rehabilitation.

METHOD: Four electronic databases and two peer-reviewed implementation science journals were searched to identify studies meeting inclusion criteria. Two reviewers applied the inclusion parameters and consulted with a third reviewer, as needed, to achieve consensus. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change project and the Implementation Outcomes Framework guided synthesis of review findings.

RESULTS: The initial search yielded 1219 studies, and 26 were included in the final review. A total of 48 out of 73 discrete implementation strategies were deployed in the included studies. The most used implementation strategies were “distribute educational materials,” “assess for readiness and identify barriers and facilitators,” and “conduct educational outreach visits.” “Adoption” was the most frequently measured implementation outcome, while “cost” was not measured in any included studies. Eleven studies reported findings to support the effectiveness of their implementation strategy or strategies; eleven studies reported inconclusive findings, and four studies found that their strategies did not lead to improved implementation outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS: With the growth of the stroke survivor population, the occupational therapy profession must identify effective strategies that promote the uptake of evidence-based practices into routine stroke care.(Wrong, wrong, wrong! Survivors want recovery, NOT 'CARE' you blithering idiots!)Occupational therapy researchers and practitioners are encouraged to collaborate to develop and deploy implementation strategies responsive to known implementation barriers and facilitators in the stroke rehabilitation setting.

IMPACT STATEMENT: This review highlights implementation strategies and outcomes that have been examined in the stroke rehabilitation literature. Moreover, it facilitates the need to explore effective implementation strategies to enhance the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of evidence-based practices and improving outcomes. This research is pertinent as it remains unclear which implementation strategies are most effective and implementation theories or frameworks guide limited research.

VCU Health Community Memorial Hospital is recognized for stroke care

 

Big fucking whoopee.

 

 But you tell us NOTHING ABOUT RESULTS. They remind us they 'care' about us multiple times but never tell us how many 100% recovered.  You have to ask yourself why they are hiding their incompetency by not disclosing recovery results. ARE THEY THAT FUCKING BAD?

Anytime I see the word 'care' in stroke I know that we don't have the right goals anywhere in stroke. 100% recovery is the only goal in stroke. NOT 'care'.

 

Three measurements will tell me if the stroke hospital is possibly not completely incompetent; DO YOU MEASURE ANYTHING?  I would start cleaning the hospital by firing the board of directors, you can't let incompetency continue for years at a time.

There is no quality here if you don't measure the right things.

  1. tPA full recovery? Better than 12%?
  2. 30 day deaths? Better than competitors?
  3. rehab full recovery? Better than 10%?

 

You'll want to know results so call that hospital president(Whoever that is) RESULTS are; tPA efficacy, 30 day deaths, 100% recovery. Because there is no point in going to that hospital if they are not willing to publish results.


 

In my opinion Get With the Guidelines allows stroke hospitals to continue with their tyranny of low expectations and justify their complete failure to get survivors 100% recovered. Prove me wrong, I dare you in my stroke addled mind. If your stroke hospital goal is not 100% recovery you don't have a functioning stroke hospital.

All you ever get from hospitals are that they are following 'Get With the Guidelines'; these are way too static to be of any use. With thousands of pieces of stroke research yearly it would take a Ph.D. level research analyst to keep up, create protocols, and train the doctors and therapists in their use. 

If your stroke hospital doesn't have that, you don't have a well functioning stroke hospital, you have a dinosaur. 

Read the guidelines yourself here:  You'll see they say they improve outcomes but give no proof that it is happening. I find nothing in here that states they are even measuring results or recovery. Since neither seems to occur, it is in my opinion invalid recognition.

“What's measured, improves.” So said management legend and author Peter F. Drucker 

Get With The Guidelines® Stroke

 The latest invalid chest thumping here:

VCU Health Community Memorial Hospital is recognized for stroke care

The American Heart Association GoldPlus Get With The Guidelines – Stroke award is given to hospitals committed to providing high-quality care for stroke patients.

VCU Health Community Memorial Hospital has received the American Heart Association GoldPlus Get With The Guidelines -- Stroke quality achievement award for its commitment to ensuring stroke patients receive the most appropriate treatment according to nationally recognized, research-based guidelines, ultimately leading to more lives saved and reduced disability.

Stroke is the fifth leading cause of death and a leading cause of disability in the United States. A stroke occurs when a blood vessel that carries oxygen and nutrients to the brain is either blocked by a clot or bursts. When that happens, part of the brain cannot get the blood and oxygen it needs, so cells die. Early stroke detection and treatment are key to improving survival, minimizing disability and accelerating recovery time.

Get With The Guidelines puts the expertise of the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association to work for hospitals nationwide, helping ensure patient care is aligned with the latest evidence and research-based guidelines. Get With The Guidelines - Stroke is an in-hospital program for improving stroke care by promoting consistent adherence to these guidelines, which can minimize the long-term effects of a stroke and even prevent death.

“We are committed to improving patient care by adhering to the latest treatment guidelines,” said Tonya Wright, R.N., stroke coordinator at VCU Health CMH. “Get With The Guidelines makes it easier for our teams to put proven knowledge and guidelines to work on a daily basis, which studies show can help patients recover better. The end goal is to ensure more people in Southside Virginia and northern North Carolina can experience longer, healthier lives.”

Each year, program participants qualify for the award by demonstrating how their organization has committed to providing quality care for stroke patients. In addition to following treatment guidelines, Get With The Guidelines participants also educate patients to help them manage their health and recovery at home. 
“We are incredibly pleased to recognize VCU Health CMH for its commitment to caring for patients with stroke,” said Steven Messe, M.D., chair of the ASA’s Stroke System of Care Advisory Group. “Participation in Get With The Guidelines is associated with improved patient outcomes, fewer readmissions and lower mortality rates – a win for health care systems, families and communities.”

VCU Health CMH also received two other important designations: the Stroke Honor Roll Elite and Type 2 Diabetes Honor Roll. To qualify for these recognitions, hospitals must meet specific criteria that reduce the time between an eligible patient’s arrival at the hospital and treatment with a clot-buster, and ensure patients with Type 2 diabetes receive the most up-to-date, evidence-based care when hospitalized due to stroke.

If you or someone near you experiences a stroke, call 911 immediately. To learn more about stroke symptoms, visit our website.

CMH recognized for outstanding stroke care program

 

Big fucking whoopee.

 

 But you tell us NOTHING ABOUT RESULTS. They remind us they 'care' about us multiple times but never tell us how many 100% recovered.  You have to ask yourself why they are hiding their incompetency by not disclosing recovery results. ARE THEY THAT FUCKING BAD?

Anytime I see the word 'care' in stroke I know that we don't have the right goals anywhere in stroke. 100% recovery is the only goal in stroke. NOT 'care'.

 

Three measurements will tell me if the stroke hospital is possibly not completely incompetent; DO YOU MEASURE ANYTHING?  I would start cleaning the hospital by firing the board of directors, you can't let incompetency continue for years at a time.

There is no quality here if you don't measure the right things.

  1. tPA full recovery? Better than 12%?
  2. 30 day deaths? Better than competitors?
  3. rehab full recovery? Better than 10%?

 

You'll want to know results so call that hospital president(Whoever that is) RESULTS are; tPA efficacy, 30 day deaths, 100% recovery. Because there is no point in going to that hospital if they are not willing to publish results.


 

In my opinion Get With the Guidelines allows stroke hospitals to continue with their tyranny of low expectations and justify their complete failure to get survivors 100% recovered. Prove me wrong, I dare you in my stroke addled mind. If your stroke hospital goal is not 100% recovery you don't have a functioning stroke hospital.

All you ever get from hospitals are that they are following 'Get With the Guidelines'; these are way too static to be of any use. With thousands of pieces of stroke research yearly it would take a Ph.D. level research analyst to keep up, create protocols, and train the doctors and therapists in their use. 

If your stroke hospital doesn't have that, you don't have a well functioning stroke hospital, you have a dinosaur. 

Read the guidelines yourself here:  You'll see they say they improve outcomes but give no proof that it is happening. I find nothing in here that states they are even measuring results or recovery. Since neither seems to occur, it is in my opinion invalid recognition.

“What's measured, improves.” So said management legend and author Peter F. Drucker 

Get With The Guidelines® Stroke

 The latest invalid chest thumping here:

CMH recognized for outstanding stroke care program


Contributed photoCMH has again been recognized for its outstanding stroke care program, receiving the American Heart Association (AHA)/American Stroke Association’s (ASA) Get With The Guidelines Stroke Gold Plus Quality Achievement Award. This year’s recognition marks the fifth consecutive year that CMH has earned the AHA/ASA’s top award for stroke care. The AHA/ASA stroke award recognizes CMH’s excellence in providing stroke patients with the most appropriate treatment aligned with nationally recognized, evidenced based guidelines. The Gold Plus award, the highest level possible, is an advanced level of recognition acknowledging select hospitals for consistent high level performance across a broad range of stroke care quality measures. Pictured are some of the many CMH staff who were recently recognized by CMH leadership for their contribution to the stroke care program. From the left are Molly Kircher, RN; Sara O’Leary, EDT; Hunter Broockmann, Nurse Extern; Brett Richards, EDT; Giana Barese, Nurse Extern; and Frank Saladino Emergency Services Nurse Manager.

Quantitatively assessing aging effects in rapid motor behaviours: a cross-sectional study

Post stroke I no longer have any rapid motor behaviors. Nothing my doctor or therapists did addressed fixing my slow speed of movement.  They were responsible but did nothing.

Quantitatively assessing aging effects in rapid motor behaviours: a cross-sectional study

 

Abstract

Background

An individual’s rapid motor skills allow them to perform many daily activities and are a hallmark of physical health. Although age and sex are both known to affect motor performance, standardized methods for assessing their impact on upper limb function are limited.

Methods

Here we perform a cross-sectional study of 643 healthy human participants in two interactive motor tasks developed to quantify sensorimotor abilities, Object-Hit (OH) and Object-Hit-and-Avoid (OHA). The tasks required participants to hit virtual objects with and without the presence of distractor objects. Velocities and positions of hands and objects were recorded by a robotic exoskeleton, allowing a variety of parameters to be calculated for each trial. We verified that these tasks are viable for measuring performance in healthy humans and we examined whether any of our recorded parameters were related to age or sex.

Results

Our analysis shows that both OH and OHA can assess rapid motor behaviours in healthy human participants. It also shows that while some parameters in these tasks decline with age, those most associated with the motor system do not. Three parameters show significant sex-related effects in OH, but these effects disappear in OHA.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the underlying effect of aging on rapid motor behaviours is not on the capabilities of the motor system, but on the brain’s capacity for processing inputs into motor actions. Additionally, this study provides a baseline description of healthy human performance in OH and OHA when using these tasks to investigate age-related declines in sensorimotor ability.

Background

The ability to perform rapid motor behaviours underpins our interactions with the world, e.g., driving a car, dancing with a partner, or simply reacting when bumped walking in a crowded shopping mall. In recognition of their importance to our daily lives, motor skills have been incorporated into a number of neuropsychological tests, assessing individuals for cognitive and sensorimotor impairments [1,2,3]. Unfortunately, motor abilities predictably decline with age and these declines eventually limit many individuals’ independence [4]. With the world projected to have two billion people aged 60 or over by 2050, [5], there is a powerful motivation to measure the effects of aging on the motor system.

Aging impacts individuals’ motor abilities in a number of ways, including: reducing muscle strength [6,7,8], reducing visuomotor adaptation [9, 10], worsening reach-to-grasp movements [11], declining motor imagery abilities [12], decreasing accuracy in bimanual movements [13], increasing perception of physical fatigue [14], and decreasing proprioceptive acuity [15,16,17]. There is evidence that an individual’s aging experience will be affected by their sex, with aging having different impacts on various regions in male and female brains [18,19,20]. There are also underlying sex-related differences in both sensorimotor skill [15, 21] and visuospatial abilities [22,23,24].

Confoundingly, there is also evidence that some characteristics of the sensorimotor system are resilient to age, such as the mechanical properties of the elbow [25], the ability to perform complex motor actions [26, 27], the ability to act without visual feedback [28, 29], and grip strength when fatigued [30]. This points to the difficulty in deciding how declines in motor abilities due to age will affect daily activities at the population-level, let alone for a given individual.

Therefore, there is a clear need for tests that provide a holistic view of age-related declines in motor abilities. There has been a recent proliferation of rapid motor behavioural tasks with interactive components. To date these tasks have been used to quantify impairments after stroke [31, 32], to study decision-making [33, 34], and to study planning [35], but they also hold the promise of assisting research into the effects of age and sex on sensorimotor skills. Understanding how motor behaviours change with age in these interactive settings will help to develop new neuropsychological tests and equipment to evaluate an individual’s ability to perform every day rapid motor actions.

The purpose of this study is to better understand the effects that age and sex have on an individual’s rapid motor skills. Our hypothesis is that both age and sex will affect rapid motor skills, with participants who are younger and male showing superior performance. We test this hypothesis with two interactive motor behaviour tasks, namely Object-Hit (OH) [31] and Object-Hit-and-Avoid (OHA) [32], which are performed in a robotic exoskeleton to enable the recording of upper limb and joint positions throughout trials. We verify that these tasks are appropriate for testing healthy individuals by demonstrating that participants must reach and maintain their peak steady-state rate of performance to maximize their performance during trials. We then use a large dataset of healthy control participants (n = 643, ages 18–93) who have performed these tasks to assess aging effects on motor behaviours. We perform linear regressions with 16 recorded and computed parameters to determine which are significantly impacted by age. We also tested for sex-related effects (male vs. female) on motor behaviours and on aging effects given their occurrence in the sensorimotor and aging literatures.

More at link.