Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, August 20, 2025

Cognitive Scores Improve With Lifestyle Changes, Trial Shows

 Does your competent? doctor have enough functioning brain cells to get this into a protocol to prevent your cognitive decline post stroke?

Cognitive Scores Improve With Lifestyle Changes, Trial Shows


TORONTO -- Two lifestyle interventions -- one structured, the other self-guided -- improved cognition in older adults at risk of cognitive decline, the 2-year U.S. POINTER trial showed.

Global cognitive scores increased from baseline in both the structured group (mean annual increase rate 0.243 SD, 95% CI 0.227-0.258) and the self-guided group (0.213 SD, 95% CI 0.198-0.229), reported Laura Baker, PhD, of Wake Forest University School of Medicine in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, at the Alzheimer's Association International Conferenceopens in a new tab or window.

The mean annual increase was greater by 0.029 SD (95% CI 0.008-0.050, P=0.008) in the structured compared with the self-guided group. The findings were published simultaneously in JAMAopens in a new tab or window.

Both interventions encouraged physical activity, cognitive activity, healthy diet, social engagement, and cardiovascular health monitoring. They differed in structure, intensity, and accountability.

The study is the first large-scale, randomized clinical trial to show that healthy lifestyle interventions may protect cognitive function in diverse U.S. populations.

"What we have learned -- what we know from this trial -- is that healthy behaviors matter," Baker said in a press briefing.

Compared with the self-guided group, the structured group performed at a level comparable to adults 1 to 2 years younger in age -- an effect that likely increases brain resilience, Baker pointed out.

Research suggests that worldwide dementia risk could fall by 45%opens in a new tab or window if 14 risk factors were modified at various stages of life. Some public health measures -- like improved education and cardiovascular risk management -- may have already had an effect as dementia incidence has declined in the U.S.opens in a new tab or window and other countries, noted Jonathan Schott, MD, of the University College London.

"In addition to general population-level preventive strategies, a complementary approach to dementia prevention is to target individuals at increased risk either via personalized prevention strategies or through structured programs incorporating multiple behavioral modifications such as diet, physical activity, cognitive training, and vascular risk management," Schott wrote in a JAMA editorial

opens in a new tab or window.

Early evidence for this approach came from the FINGER trial,opens in a new tab or window which demonstrated that a 2-year intervention improved or maintained cognitive performance in at-risk older adults in Finland. The U.S. POINTER findings are broadly in line with FINGER, but its interpretation requires nuance, Schott observed.

"While U.S. POINTER was designed and powered as a head-to-head comparison of the two interventions, and a statistically significant advantage was seen in the group receiving the structured intervention, the clinical relevance of this difference -- roughly a 14% relative benefit -- is uncertain," he wrote.

"Rather than the difference, the more striking finding is perhaps the similarity of the cognitive benefits across both groups, despite the self-guided group requiring only a fraction of the engagement and interventions," Schott pointed out.

U.S. POINTERopens in a new tab or window was a single-blind randomized trial that followed 2,111 participants at five U.S. sites starting in 2019. Participants were ages 60 to 79, had a sedentary lifestyle, a suboptimal diet, and at least two additional risk factors for cognitive decline: a family history of memory impairment, cardiometabolic risk, race and ethnicity, older age, or sex.

Participants were randomly assigned to structured (1,056 people) or self-guided (1,055 people) interventions. The structured group attended 38 team meetings over 2 years and followed a plan of regular moderate- to high-intensity physical exercise, adherence to the MIND dietopens in a new tab or window, cognitive training, social engagement, and cardiovascular health monitoring.

The second group attended six team meetings to encourage self-selected lifestyle changes that best fit their needs and schedules. Study staff provided general encouragement without goal-directed coaching.

The primary comparison was assessed by a composite measure of executive function, episodic memory, and processing speed over 2 years.

Mean age was 68 years and 68.9% were women. More than 30% of participants were from populations typically underrepresented in clinical trials, the researchers said.

In total, 89% of participants completed the year 2 assessment. Based on prespecified subgroup comparisons, the structured intervention benefit was consistent for APOE4 carriers and noncarriers (P=0.95 for interaction), and appeared to be greater for adults with lower versus higher baseline cognition (P=0.02 for interaction). Cognitive benefits were consistent across age, sex, ethnicity, and heart health status.

Fewer adverse events emerged in the structured group (151 serious and 1,091 non-serious events) versus the self-guided group (190 serious and 1,225 non-serious events). A positive COVID-19 test result was the most common adverse event overall and was more frequent in the structured group.

Complex diseases like heart disease and cancer use combination treatment strategies tailored to individual needs, noted co-author Heather Snyder, PhD, of the Alzheimer's Association, which sponsored the trial. "The next generation of treatments for diseases like Alzheimer's will likely integrate drug and non-drug strategies," Snyder said.

"While these results are fascinating and extremely hopeful, how they are rolled out to the public -- especially those at risk for Alzheimer's and other diseases that cause dementia -- needs to be handled with care and individual attention to tailor to the local environment," she added.

The study had several limitations. All participants were at risk of cognitive impairment and findings might not apply to other groups. The trial was not powered to assess dementia outcomes, the researchers acknowledged. The self-guided group did not serve as true controls and the long-terms effects of the interventions are unknown.

The Alzheimer's Association said it will follow participants for 4 more years to assess future cognitive trajectories. The organization also plans to bring U.S. POINTER interventions to other communities.

No comments:

Post a Comment