Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, August 20, 2025

Developing upper limb functional electrical stimulation clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation

 Totally godawful research: survivors want EXACT PROTOCOLS; not useless guidelines. Guidelines don't guarantee recovery you blithering idiots!

Yeah, a thesis, but the advisor is incompetent. Not in my world!

Developing upper limb functional electrical stimulation clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation


SCOTT, Geraldine Hilary (2025). Developing upper limb functional electrical stimulation clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation. Doctoral, Sheffield Hallam University. [Thesis]

Abstract
This thesis explores the use of upper limb (UL) functional electrical stimulation (FES) in clinical settings in people with stroke and information that supports the development of clinical practice guidelines. Chapter 1 introduces the thesis and provides an overview of this multimethod programme of research. Chapter 2 presents the background literature, outlining the context of the rehabilitation of the UL post-stroke and the use of functional electrical stimulation in the management of post-stroke UL impairments to drive functional recovery. Chapter 3 outlines the research paradigm, focusing particularly on the epistemological and ontological positions taken and the rationale for adopting a pragmatic approach with multimethods. Chapter 4 is the first study in the thesis and is a systematic review of the treatment parameters for UL FES post-stroke. The systematic review highlighted that there was too much variance between functional electrical stimulation applications to indicate recommended UL treatment parameters. The resulting gaps relating to UL FES treatment parameters in the literature indicated the need for a better understanding of UL clinical presentations that informed prescription/use of UL FES, and this helped shape the methodology used in chapter 5. Chapter 5 is a review of the medical records within an NHS Foundation Trust stroke pathway. This medical records review indicated the lack of detail within the medical documentation relating to the management of the post-stroke UL and the limited use of UL FES across the stroke pathway, which supported the justification for chapter 6 methodology. Chapter 6 is a qualitative study exploring the views of physiotherapists, occupational therapists and rehabilitation assistants working within two large NHS Foundation Trust stroke pathways about the management of the UL post-stroke and the use of UL FES. Chapter 7 concludes the data collection in the thesis using a Delphi method to gain consensus on best practice in the use of UL FES in the management of people with stroke. The findings of this chapter establish a set of consensus statements that will support the development of clinical practice guidelines. Chapter 8 concludes the thesis by presenting a critical review of the research findings and highlights future research possibilities.
More Information

No comments:

Post a Comment