Finally we have something that maybe will finally be able to determine if we have good, bad, ugly or evil neurons. Then we can research ways to duplicate what goes on in neuroplasticity. Ask your researcher when they will create a protocol that will make neuroplasticity replicable.
http://www.alphagalileo.org/ViewItem.aspx?ItemId=128565&CultureCode=en
First signals from brain nerve cells with ultrathin nanowires
Electrodes operated into the brain are today used in research and to
treat diseases such as Parkinson’s. However, their use has been limited
by their size. At Lund University in Sweden, researchers have, for the
first time, succeeded in implanting an ultrathin nanowire-based
electrode and capturing signals from the nerve cells in the brain of a
laboratory animal.
The researchers work at Lund University’s Neuronano Research Centre
in an interdisciplinary collaboration between experts in subjects
including neurophysiology, biomaterials, electrical measurements and
nanotechnology. Their electrode is composed of a group of nanowires,
each of which measures only 200 nanometres (billionths of a metre) in
diameter.
Such thin electrodes have previously only been used in experiments with cell cultures.
“Carrying out experiments on a living animal is much more difficult.
We are pleased that we have succeeded in developing a functioning
nano-electrode, getting it into place and capturing signals from nerve
cells”, says Professor Jens Schouenborg, who is head of the Neuronano
Research Centre.
He sees this as a real breakthrough, but also as only a step on the
way. The research group has already worked for several years to develop
electrodes that are thin and flexible enough not to disturb the brain
tissue, and with material that does not irritate the cells nearby. They
now have the first evidence that it is possible to obtain useful nerve
signals from nanometre-sized electrodes.
The research will now take a number of directions. The researchers
want to try and reduce the size of the base to which the nanowires are
attached, improve the connection between the electrode and the
electronics that receive the signals from the nerve cells, and
experiment with the surface structure of the electrodes to see what
produces the best signals without damaging the brain cells.
“In the future, we hope to be able to make electrodes with
nanostructured surfaces that are adapted to the various parts of the
nerve cells – parts that are no bigger than a few billionths of a metre.
Then we could tailor-make each electrode based on where it is going to
be placed and what signals it is to capture or emit”, says Jens
Schouenborg.
When an electrode is inserted into the brain of a patient or a
laboratory animal, it is generally anchored to the skull. This means
that it doesn’t move smoothly with the brain, which floats inside the
skull, but rather rubs against the surrounding tissue, which in the long
term causes the signals to deteriorate. The Lund group’s electrodes
will instead be anchored by their surface structure.
“With the right pattern on the surface, they will stay in place yet
still move with the body – and the brain – thereby opening up for
long-term monitoring of neurones”, explains Jens Schouenborg.
He praises the collaboration between medics, physicists and others at
the Neuronano Research Centre, and mentions physicist Dmitry B. Suyatin
in particular. He is the principal author of the article which the
researchers have now published in the international journal PLOS ONE.
The overall goal of the Neuronano Research Centre is to develop
electrodes that can be inserted into the brain to study learning, pain
and other mechanisms, and, in the long term, to treat conditions such as
chronic pain, depression and Parkinson’s disease.
The article in PLOS ONE can be found at www.plosone.org by searching for Schouenborg.
Use the labels in the right column to find what you want. Or you can go thru them one by one, there are only 29,286 posts. Searching is done in the search box in upper left corner. I blog on anything to do with stroke. DO NOT DO ANYTHING SUGGESTED HERE AS I AM NOT MEDICALLY TRAINED, YOUR DOCTOR IS, LISTEN TO THEM. BUT I BET THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET YOU 100% RECOVERED. I DON'T EITHER BUT HAVE PLENTY OF QUESTIONS FOR YOUR DOCTOR TO ANSWER.
Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.
What this blog is for:
My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment