Excuses, excuses, excuses. Damn it all, I want to know what the hell you are doing to get these ineligible patients 100% recovered. NOTHING? Then get the hell out of stroke and into an easier job, maybe basket making or watching paint dry.
Notification Strategy and Predictors of Outcome in Stroke Ineligible for Reperfusion Therapies
- 1János Szentágothai Doctoral School of Neurosciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- 2Department of Neurology, National Institute of Psychiatry and Addictions Nyíro Gyula, Budapest, Hungary
- 3Department of Probability Theory and Statistics, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
- 4Department of Health Systems Management and Quality Management in Health Care, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
- 5Department of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- 6MTA-SE Neuroepidemiological Research Group, Budapest, Hungary
Background, Objective: At least 70% of
all stroke patients are ineligible for recanalization therapy. We
identified predictors of outcome among these patients, with special
focus on notification of emergency medical services (EMS).
Methods: We prospectively collected
data of 250 consecutive patients with acute cerebrovascular diseases
ineligible for recanalization therapy. Initial notification strategy and
outcome were analyzed by regression models.
Results: EMS notification rate was 55,
41, and 21% in patients with <6 6="" and="">24 h stroke-to-door
time. Atrial fibrillation (AF; OR = 2.66, 95% CI: 1.19–5.96), stroke
severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, NIHSS; OR =
1.12, 95% CI: 1.02–1.23), history of any psychiatric disease (OR = 2.2,
95% CI: 0.98–4.97), aphasia (OR = 1.99, 95% CI: 0.99–3.98), and
residence type were predictors of EMS notification. Disability (modified
Rankin Scale score [mRS]) both at discharge and at 1 year was
associated with age, admission NIHSS score, type of cerebrovascular
disorder, and pre-stroke mRS at discharge and discharge mRS at
follow-up. Age (HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02–1.08) and NIHSS (HR = 1.16, 95%
CI: 1.12–1.21) had a significant effect on the relative hazard of death.6>
Conclusions: EMS notification is
influenced by AF, stroke severity, psychiatric disease, aphasia, and
residence type. Early disability depends on age, the type and severity
of the stroke, and pre-stroke mRS. Predictors of disability at 1 year
after stroke are age, stoke severity, mRS at discharge, and recurrent
ischemic stroke. Higher NIHSS and older age are associated with higher
case fatality. In patients ineligible for recanalization, EMS
notification had no significant effect on outcome, regarding both
disability and survival.
No comments:
Post a Comment