The only thing you should have done is create protocols that move survivors from the low mobility function to the high mobility function. This is useless shit.
Cutoff score of the lower-extremity motor subscale of Fugl-Meyer assessment in chronic stroke survivors: A cross-sectional study
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , Volume 100(9) , Pgs. 1782-1787.NARIC Accession Number: J82458. What's this?
ISSN: 0003-9993.
Author(s): Kwong, Patrick W. H.; Ng, Shamay S. M..
Publication Year: 2019.
Number of Pages: 6.
Abstract:
Study identified an optimal cutoff score for the lower-extremity motor subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) to differentiate stroke survivors with high mobility function from those with low mobility function using a data-driven approach. Eighty chronic stroke survivors, recruited from local self-help groups, completed the lower-extremity motor subscale of the FMA (FMA-LE), Berg Balance Scale, 5 times sit-to-stand test, comfortable walking speed, 6-Minute Walk Test, and Timed Up and Go test. K-mean clustering analysis classified 42 stroke survivors in the high mobility function group. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that FMA-LE can differentiate stroke survivors based on their mobility level (area under the curve, 0.85). An FMA-LE score of 21 of 34 was the best cutoff score (sensitivity: 0.87; specificity: 0.81). This study found that an FMA-LE score of 21 or higher could indicate a high level of mobility function in chronic stroke survivors.Descriptor Terms: LIMBS, MEASUREMENTS, MOBILITY, MOTOR SKILLS, OUTCOMES, STROKE.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Citation: Kwong, Patrick W. H., Ng, Shamay S. M.. (2019). Cutoff score of the lower-extremity motor subscale of Fugl-Meyer assessment in chronic stroke survivors: A cross-sectional study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 100(9), Pgs. 1782-1787. Retrieved 1/25/2020, from REHABDATA database.
No comments:
Post a Comment