I have seen nothing that even remotely suggests that any stroke damage diagnosis is objective. With nothing objective it is impossible to determine exactly what protocols worked and which ones to prescribe. The prescription of E.T.(Evaluate and Treat) by the doctor to all therapists is completely showing that the doctor is taking no responsibility for survivor recovery.
Inconsistent classification of mild stroke and implications of health services delivery
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation — Roberts PS, et al. | January 30, 2020
inequalities in the classification of mild
stroke are evident with varying use of stroke severity assessments,
measurement cut-off scores, imaging tools, and clinical or functional
outcomes. Moreover, continued work is needed to establish a consensus
definition of mild stroke, which directly influences treatment receipt,
referral for services, and health service delivery.
Researchers sought to perform a scoping
review of mild stroke definitions based on stroke severity evaluations
and/or clinical signs and symptoms reported in the literature. They
searched PubMed, PsycINFO (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCO) databases added
keyword combinations of a mild stroke, minor stroke, mini-stroke, mild
cerebrovascular, minor cerebrovascular, transient ischemic attack, or
TIA. For the final review, 62 studies were selected. Between January
2003 and February 2018, inclusion criteria were limited to articles
published. It was noted that
Read the full article on Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
No comments:
Post a Comment