So punting the failures and not solving the 100% recovery need. THIS is why we need survivors in charge.
Potential for new technologies in clinical practice. Current opinions in neurology
Jane H. Burridge and Ann-Marie HughesPurpose of review Cost-effective neurorehabilitation is essential owing to financial constraints on healthcare resources. Technologies have the potential to contribute but without strong clinical evidence are unlikely to be widely reimbursed. This review presents evidence of new technologies since 2008 and identifies barriers to translation of technologies into clinical practice. (Solve those barriers, that is actually your job. Or do you expect survivors to be ok with these failures?) Recent findings Technology has not been shown to be superior to intensively matched existing therapies. Research has been undertaken into the development and preliminary clinical testing of novel technologies including robotics, electrical stimulation, constraint induced movement therapy, assistive orthoses, noninvasive brain stimulation, virtual reality and gaming devices. Translation of the research into clinical practice has been impeded by a lack of robust evidence of clinical effectiveness and usability. Underlying mechanisms associated with recovery are beginning to be explored, which may lead to more targeted interventions. Improvements in function have been demonstrated beyond the normal recovery period, but few trials demonstrate lasting effects. Summary Technologies, alone or combined, may offer a cost-effective way to deliver intensive neurorehabilitation therapy in clinical and community environments, and have the potential to empower patients to take more responsibility for their rehabilitation and continue with long-term exercise.(Damn it all. When are doctors going to take responsibility for getting their patients 100% recovered? This blaming the patient needs to stop.)
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, _- Southampton, UK
+espondence to Professor Jane Burridge, PhD, ty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, - ampton SO 17 1BJ, UK - _ -44 23 8059 8885; e-mail: jhb1@soton.ac.uk
- rrent Opinion in Neurology 2010, 23:671-677
conventional therapy In order to make rehabilitation more cost-effective.
Keywords clinical practice, neurorehabilitation, technology, translation, usability
Curr Opin Neurol 23:671-677 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health I Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1350-7540
No comments:
Post a Comment