Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Friday, May 6, 2022

Japan Stroke Society Guideline 2021 for the Treatment of Stroke

 Nothing in Chapter 7. Rehabilitation for subacute to chronic stroke;  even remotely suggests any path to 100% recovery. So you are screwed along with your children and grandchildren. Until we start holding stroke persons feet to the fire nothing will improve.

Japan Stroke Society Guideline 2021 for the Treatment of Stroke

First Published April 20, 2022 Research Article Find in PubMed 

The revised Japan Stroke Society Guidelines for the Treatment of Stroke were published in Japanese in July 2021. In this article, the extracted recommendation statements are published. The revision keeps pace with the great progress in stroke control based on the recently enacted Basic Act on Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease in Japan. The guideline covers the following areas: primary prevention, general acute management of stroke, ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack, intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, asymptomatic cerebrovascular disease, other cerebrovascular disease, and rehabilitation.

The Japan Stroke Society Guideline 2021 for the Treatment of Stroke is a totally revised version that is developed every 6 years, with two yearly updates in the intervening periods. The guidelines have been developed in conjunction with Japan Neurosurgical Society, the Japanese Society of Neurology, the Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine, the Japanese Society of Neurological Therapeutics, the Japanese Society on Surgery for Cerebral Stroke, and the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy. The guideline comprises 300 pages in Japanese. In this English version, recommendations of each topic are extracted and introduced. The guideline consists of seven chapters. Of these, the chapters for ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and subarachnoid hemorrhage are introduced in the main text and the other four chapters, as part of the full guideline, are presented in the supplemental material.

The Committee for Stroke Guideline 2021, selected from the members of the Japan Stroke Society(Notice no survivors were involved so the conclusions presented are invalid.), developed the present guideline based on the literature searched for the guidelines up to the 2019 version (papers published up to December 2017) and additional papers published between January 2018 and December 2019. In the Committee, there was no distinction between those who reviewed the literature and those who wrote the recommendations.

Taking into consideration the level of evidence, the balance between “benefit” and “harm” of the intervention, the influence of patient values and other factors, and the cost of the intervention and medical resources, the Committee members determined the grade of recommendations (Table 1). The level of bodies of evidence for the recommendations was determined by the Committee members after integrating the evidence of the relevant references (Table 2). Detailed explanation is described in “Level of Evidence and Grade of Recommendation” in the full article in the supplemental material.

Table

Table 1. Classification of grade of recommendation by the Committee (2021).

Table 1. Classification of grade of recommendation by the Committee (2021).

Table

Table 2. Classification of level of evidence (LOE) of the recommendations by the Committee (2021).

Table 2. Classification of level of evidence (LOE) of the recommendations by the Committee (2021).


Chapter 7. Rehabilitation for subacute to chronic stroke

(Refer the full article as the supplemental material)

Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Disclosures
All the authors completed the declaration of their conflicts of Interest (COIs) to the office of the Japan Stroke Society. COIs for all the authors are below the maximum amount for the inauguration of committee members of guidelines in the Japanese Association of Medical Sciences COI Management Guideline.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment