Deans' stroke musings: Etiology of Large Vessel Occlusion Posterior Circulation Stroke: Results of the MR CLEAN Registry

Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Thursday, September 1, 2022

Etiology of Large Vessel Occlusion Posterior Circulation Stroke: Results of the MR CLEAN Registry

Since you didn't measure 100% recovery I guess that recovery is not important to you. Maybe you want to talk to survivors sometime, they'll give you an earful.

Measure recovery and results, NOT treatment.

“What's measured, improves.” So said management legend and author Peter F. Drucker

The latest here:

Etiology of Large Vessel Occlusion Posterior Circulation Stroke: Results of the MR CLEAN Registry

F.A.V. (Anne) Pirson,

Nikki Boodt,

Josje Brouwer,

Agnetha A.E. Bruggeman,

Wouter H. Hinsenveld,

Julie Staals,

Wim H. van Zwam,

Christiaan van der Leij,

… See all authors

and on behalf of MR CLEAN Registry Investigators

Originally published11 May 2022https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.038054Stroke. 2022;53:2468–2477

Abstract

Background:

In patients with large vessel occlusion stroke of the anterior circulation, underlying cause is a determinant of outcome. Whether this is the case for posterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke has yet to be determined. We aimed to report on cause in patients with posterior circulation stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy and to analyze the association with functional outcome.

Methods:

We used data of patients with posterior circulation stroke included in the MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands) registry, a prospective multicenter observational study, between 2014 and 2018. Stroke cause was categorized into large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), cardioembolism, arterial dissection, embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), other determined cause, or undetermined cause. For primary analysis on the association between cause and outcome, we used multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis to estimate the adjusted common odds ratio for a shift towards a better functional outcome on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days with LAA as a reference group. Secondary outcomes included favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–3), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 to 48 hours, reperfusion on digital subtraction angiography, and stroke progression.

Results:

Of 264 patients with posterior circulation stroke, 84 (32%) had LAA, 48 (18%) cardioembolism, 31 (12%) dissection, and 14 (5%) ESUS. Patients with a dissection were younger (48 [interquartile range, 43–60] years) and had a lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at baseline (12 [interquartile range, 6–31]) than patients with other cause. Functional outcome was better for patients with cardioembolism and ESUS compared to LAA (modified Rankin Scale adjusted common odds ratio, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.1–5.2], respectively adjusted common odds ratio, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.0–9.3]). Patients with a dissection had a lower chance of successful reperfusion compared with LAA (adjusted odds ratio, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.06–0.70]).

Conclusions:

Unlike the anterior circulation, most frequent cause in our posterior large vessel occlusion stroke cohort is LAA followed by cardioembolism, dissection, and ESUS. Patients with cardioembolism and ESUS have a better prognosis for functional outcome after endovascular thrombectomy than patients with LAA.