Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Post-traumatic growth



How precisely is your doctor using a stroke protocol to enhance your resilience and post-traumatic growth? ANYTHING AT ALL?



http://www.dailygood.org/story/1209/the-surprising-benefit-of-going-through-hard-times-carolyn-gregoire/



some paragraphs:



The term post-traumatic growth was coined in the 1990s by psychologists Richard Tedeschi and Lawrence Calhoun to describe instances of individuals who experienced profound transformation as they coped with various types of trauma and challenging life circumstances. Up to 70 percent of trauma survivors report some positive psychological growth, research has found.



Growth after trauma can take a number of different forms, including a greater appreciation for life, the identification of new possibilities for one’s life, more satisfying interpersonal relationships, a richer spiritual life and a connection to something greater than oneself, and a sense of personal strength. A battle with cancer, for instance, can result in a renewed gratitude for one’s family, while a near-death experience could be a catalyst for connecting with a more spiritual side of life. Psychologists have found that experiences of trauma also commonly lead to increased empathy and altruism, and a motivation to act for the benefit of others.


More at link.

Study findings may help explain why risk of stroke changes after menopause

I hate these articles that don't link to actual research. You're on your own here unless you think your doctor will be useful. 

Study findings may help explain why risk of stroke changes after menopause


Risk of stroke in women may come down to a compound the body produces from estrogen known as 2-methoxyestradiol (2-ME). Furthermore, the compound's therapeutic potential may extend beyond treating stroke in women to healing brain injuries in men, a new study in American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism reports.
Microglia, the immune cells of the brain, maintain the brain and protect it from infection by consuming damaged cells and bacteria—a process called phagocytosis—and releasing toxic molecules to induce injured cells and bacteria to die. The same processes help "clean up the mess" after brain injury, such as after stroke or a head impact, says Edwin Jackson, PhD, of the University of Pittsburgh and the study's collaborating investigator. However, overactive microglia may kill brain cells that otherwise would have survived the injury, worsening instead of healing the damage, Jackson explains.
Mouse microglial cells exposed to 2-ME multiplied less and had reduced immune activity: 2-ME stopped phagocytosis and the release of toxic molecules by microglia. "2-ME prevented microglia from becoming overly active," Jackson says.
The findings help explain why risk of stroke in women changes after menopause. Menopause occurs when the ovaries stop producing the female sex hormones estrogen and progesterone. Prior to menopause, women have a lower risk of stroke compared to men. After menopause, women are at a higher risk. "Our study shows that microglia can metabolize (change) estradiol into 2-ME. So the female advantage before menopause may be in part the result of microglia making 2-ME from estradiol. Once estradiol levels collapse with menopause, the female advantage is lost. Administration of 2-ME could restore the female advantage," Jackson says. Estradiol is an estrogen and the primary female sex hormone.
The use of 2-ME is not limited to women. "Although 2-ME is derived from estradiol, 2-ME is not estrogenic and can be used in both women and men," Jackson notes. Because 2-ME "calms" microglia, it may be useful in treating or preventing other brain injuries including traumatic brain injury and chronic traumatic encephalopathy—the injury commonly found in professional football players and athletes in other contact sports, he says.
According to Jackson, current research on 2-ME supports that the compound is safe. "Unlike estradiol, 2-ME has anti-cancer activity, is cardio-protective and has beneficial activity in models of pulmonary artery hypertension. In fact, a slow-release formulation of 2-ME was developed and validated in a phase I clinical trial for pulmonary artery hypertension."
The next step is to corroborate 2-ME's effects, says Raghvendra Dubey of the University of Zurich and the study's lead investigator. These findings in cells "provide important leads which need to be further confirmed using in vivo (animal) models of brain injury," he says.

Inflammatory changes in the brain twenty years before Alzheimer onset

This brings up the interesting question; Does this inflammation cause a stroke and then those various percentages of post-stroke survivors getting dementia is just a follow on result of the initial inflammation? We'll never know because we have NO fucking stroke leadership or strategy.
http://www.alphagalileo.org/ViewItem.aspx?ItemId=160334&CultureCode=en
Roughly twenty years before the first symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease appear, inflammatory changes in the brain can be seen, according to a new study from Sweden´s Karolinska Institutet published in the medical scientific journal Brain. The findings of the researchers, who monitored several pathological changes in the brain, suggest that activation of astrocytes at an early stage can greatly influence the development of the disease.
Alzheimer’s disease is characterised by the atrophy of brain neurons, especially those involved in memory, and is our most common dementia disease. Exactly what causes the cells to die is not known, but many years before the first symptoms present themselves, pathological changes occur, such as the deposition of the protein amyloid in the form of amyloid plaques, the accumulation of tau proteins and inflammatory changes that eventually degrade the points of contact between neurons. Exactly when the changes take place along this chain of events remains, however, an unanswered question.
By studying families of people with known Alzheimer’s mutations and who therefore run a much higher risk of developing the disease, the researchers were able to examine changes that appear at a very early stage of the disease. The study included members of families with four different known Alzheimer’s mutations and a group of patients with non-inherited, ‘sporadic’ Alzheimer’s disease. All participants underwent memory tests and scans using PET (positron emission tomography), whereby radioactive tracer molecules with a short half-life are introduced into the brain via injection into the blood. For this study, the team used the tracer molecules PIB, Deprenyl and FDG to study the amount of amyloid plaques, inflammatory changes in the form of astrocyte activation, astrocytes being the most common type of glial (supporting) cell in the brain. They also studied neuronal function in the brain by measuring glucose metabolism (FDG). In order to monitor the changes over time, the PET scans were repeated after three years for half of the just over fifty participants.
The mutation carriers were found to have amyloid plaque and inflammatory changes almost twenty years before the estimated debut of memory problems. The number of astrocytes reached a peak when the amyloid plaque started to accumulate in the brain, and neuronal function, as gauged by glucose metabolism, began to decline roughly seven years before the expected disease symptoms. The individuals from families with inherited Alzheimer’s who did not carry any mutation showed no abnormal changes in their brain.
“Inflammatory changes in the form of higher levels of brain astrocytes are thought to be a very early indicator of disease onset,” explains principal investigator Professor Agneta Nordberg at the Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research at Karolinska Institutet. “Astrocyte activation peaks roughly twenty years before the expected symptoms and then goes into decline, in contrast to the accumulation of amyloid plaques, which increases constantly over time until clinical symptoms show. The accumulation of amyloid plaque and the increase in number of astrocytes therefore display opposing patterns along the timeline.”
These studies demonstrate that the pathological processes that lead ultimately to Alzheimer’s disease commence many years before symptoms start to show, and that it should be possible to provide early prophylactic or disease modifying treatment. According to the researchers behind the study, the findings indicate that astrocytes can be a possible target for new drugs.
First author of the study is Elena Rodriguez-Vieitez, PhD, senior scientist at Karolinska Institutet’s Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society. The study was financed by grants from, among others, the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SFF), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Stockholm County Council/KI ALF fund, Swedish Brain Power, the Swedish Brain Fund, and a GE Healthcare unrestricted research grant.
Karolinska Institutet − a medical university: ki.se/english
http://news.cision.com/karolinska-institutet/r/inflammatory-changes-in-the-brain-twenty-years-before-alzheimer-onset,c9903037

How to Be Your Own Hero When Faced With a Hopeless Challenge - stroke recovery

You are going to have to figure out your stroke recovery on your own. Your doctors and therapists basically know nothing as evidenced by no published stroke protocols on recovery. They would rather tell you the fuckingly stupid statement of: 'All strokes are different, all stroke recoveries are different'.

How to Be Your Own Hero When Faced With a Hopeless Challenge - Tiny Buddha

1. Act like a sea star, not a wounded bird.

2. Remember: the world is your oyster.

3. Dive deep into the research.

4. Avoid becoming overwhelmed.

5. Learn from your mistakes. (We all make them!)

6. Don’t be afraid to ask for help.

7. Make gratitude a daily habit.

Epidural Electrical Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation

Whatever the hell this means. If they are trying to stimulate the damaged side motor cortex this would completely not work for me, most of it is dead. Using Fugl-Meyer as an endpoint seems useless since it is totally subjective and has limited discrimination.
http://nnr.sagepub.com/content/30/2/107?etoc

Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blinded Everest Trial

  1. Robert M. Levy, MD, PhD1
  2. Richard L. Harvey, MD2,3
  3. Brett M. Kissela, MD4
  4. Carolee J. Winstein, PhD5
  5. Helmi L. Lutsep, MD6
  6. Todd B. Parrish, PhD2
  7. Steven C. Cramer, MD7
  8. Lalit Venkatesan, PhD8
  1. 1Marcus Neuroscience Institute, Boca Raton, FL, USA
  2. 2Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
  3. 3The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
  4. 4University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
  5. 5University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  6. 6Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
  7. 7University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
  8. 8St. Jude Medical, Plano, TX, USA
  1. Richard L. Harvey, The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, 345 East Superior Street, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. Email: rharvey@ric.org

Abstract

Background. This prospective, single-blinded, multicenter study assessed the safety and efficacy of electrical epidural motor cortex stimulation (EECS) in improving upper limb motor function of ischemic stroke patients with moderate to moderately severe hemiparesis. Methods. Patients ≥4 months poststroke were randomized 2:1 to an investigational (n = 104) or control (n = 60) group, respectively. Investigational patients were implanted (n = 94) with an epidural 6-contact lead perpendicular to the primary motor cortex and a pulse generator. Both groups underwent 6 weeks of rehabilitation, but EECS was delivered to investigational patients during rehabilitation. The primary efficacy endpoint (PE) was defined as attaining a minimum improvement of 4.5 points in the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) scale as well as 0.21 points in the Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT) 4 weeks postrehabilitation. Follow-up assessments were performed 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks postrehabilitation. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events (AEs) that occurred between enrollment and the end of rehabilitation. Results. Primary intent-to-treat analysis showed no group differences at 4 weeks, with PE being met by 32% and 29% of investigational and control patients, respectively (P = .36). Repeated-measures secondary analyses revealed no significant treatment group differences in mean UEFM or AMAT scores. However, post hoc comparisons showed that a greater proportion of investigational (39%) than control (15%) patients maintained or achieved PE (P = .003) at 24 weeks postrehabilitation. Investigational group mean AMAT scores also improved significantly (P < .05) when compared to the control group at 24 weeks postrehabilitation. Post hoc analyses also showed that 69% (n = 9/13) of the investigational patients who elicited movement thresholds during stimulation testing met PE at 4 weeks, and mean UEFM and AMAT scores was also significantly higher (P < .05) in this subgroup at the 4-, 12-, and 24-week assessments when compared to the control group. Headache (19%), pain (13%), swelling (7%), and infection (7%) were the most commonly observed implant procedure-related AEs. Overall, there were 11 serious AEs in 9 investigational group patients (7 procedure related, 4 anesthesia related). Conclusions. The primary analysis pertaining to efficacy of EECS during upper limb motor rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients was negative at 4 weeks postrehabilitation. A better treatment response was observed in a subset of patients eliciting stimulation induced upper limb movements during motor threshold assessments performed prior to each rehabilitation session. Post hoc comparisons indicated treatment effect differences at 24 weeks, with the control group showing significant decline in the combined primary outcome measure relative to the investigational group. These results have the potential to inform future chronic stroke rehabilitation trial design.

Eating polyunsaturated fats may lower risk for heart disease, stroke

Are you now saying all these previous research results were wrong? I'm sure your hospital and doctor have no clue what to do as far as a diet stroke protocol is concerned.  This is a job for that great stroke association.
Saturated Fat and CAD: It's Complicated

An Interview With The Big Fat Surprise Author Nina Teicholz

Nutrition Advice: Can We Stop the 'Low-Fat, Low-Carb' Lingo?


No Evidence to Support Dietary Fat Recommendations, Meta-Analysis Finds

Dairy Saturated Fats Lower Type 2 Diabetes Risk

CV Risk and Saturated Fats: The Debate Roils On

Dietary Saturated Fat Has Undeserved Bad Reputation, Says Review

The newest here:

Eating polyunsaturated fats may lower risk for heart disease, stroke


Large Volumes of Critically Hypoperfused Penumbral Tissue Do Not Preclude Good Outcomes After Complete Endovascular Reperfusion

So you are screwed if you don't fit the inclusion criteria. A great stroke association would leave no survivor behind. We would solve stroke problems for everyone, not just the easy ones.
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/47/1/94.abstract?sid=a1b8f447-dbba-4e5d-bcff-f1b5a4849a56

Redefining Malignant Profile

  1. Michael Frankel, MD
+ Author Affiliations
  1. From the Department of Neurology (R.G.N., D.C.H., L.C.R., A.L., S.B., A.A., M.F.) and the Department of Radiology (S.D., M.B.), Emory University and Grady Memorial Hospital - Marcus Stroke and Neuroscience Center, Atlanta, GA.
  1. Correspondence to Raul G. Nogueira, MD, 49 Jesse Hill Jr Dr SE, Room #333, Atlanta, GA 30303. E-mail raul.g.nogueira@emory.edu
  1. * Drs Nogueira and Haussen contributed equally and qualify for equal level of authorship.

Abstract

Background and Purpose—Acute ischemic stroke patients with large volumes of severe hypoperfusion (Tmax>10 s>100 mL) on magnetic resonance imaging have a higher likelihood of intracranial hemorrhage and poor outcomes after reperfusion. We aim to evaluate the impact of the extent of Tmax>10 s CTP lesions in patients undergoing successful treatment.
Methods—Retrospective database review of endovascular acute ischemic stroke treatment between September 2010 and March 2015 for patients with anterior circulation occlusions with baseline RAPID CTP and full reperfusion (mTICI 3). The primary outcome was the impact of the Tmax>10 s lesion spectrum on infarct growth. Secondary safety and efficacy outcomes included parenchymal hematomas and good clinical outcomes (90-day modified Rankin Scale score, 0–2).
Results—Of 684 treated patients, 113 patients fit the inclusion criteria. Tmax>10 s>100 mL patients (n=37) had significantly higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (20.7±3.8 versus 17.0±5.9; P<0.01), more internal carotid artery terminus occlusions (29% versus 9%; P=0.02), and larger baseline (38.6±29.6 versus 11.7±15.8 mL; P<0.01) and final (60.7±60.0 versus 29.4±33.9 mL; P<0.01) infarct volumes when compared with patients without Tmax>10 s>100 mL (n=76); however, the 2 groups were otherwise well balanced. There were no significant differences in infarct growth (22.1±51.6 versus 17.8±32.4 mL; P=0.78), severe intracranial hemorrhage (PH2: 2% versus 4%; P=0.73), good outcomes (90-day mRS score, 0–2: 56% versus 59%; P=0.83), or 90-day mortality (16% versus 7%; P=0.28). On multivariate analysis, only baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–1.34; P<0.01) and baseline infarct core volume (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.08; P<0.01) were independently associated with Tmax>10 s>100 mL. There was no association between Tmax>10 s>100 mL with any PH, good outcome, or infarct growth.
Conclusions—In the setting of limited baseline ischemic cores, large Tmax>10 s lesions on computed tomographic perfusion do not seem to be associated with a higher risk of parenchymal hematomas and do not preclude good outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular reperfusion with contemporary technology.

New research highlights importance of stroke tests

What a joke, if you want to asses the level of damage you do PET and MRI scans to objectively diagnose the damage, not this  questionnaire crap. Nothing here is repeatable/comparable in any clinical study.
New research highlights importance of stroke tests 
A tool used to assess the level of damage done to the brain after a stroke is incredibly valuable, new research has suggested.

The findings, published in the journal Clinical Rehabilitation, looked at the efficiency of the ‘Patient-Reported Evaluation of Cognitive State’ (PRECiS), a 27-item questionnaire that aims to identify the cognitive problems of stroke survivors and is used to help measure progress that is made during rehabilitation.
Dr Emma Patchick, lead author of the study, said people who survive a stroke often have very different experiences of the impact of cognitive difficulties, depending on their life situation.
PRECiS was originally designed to help assess clinical trials but has since been influenced by people who have experienced a stroke and now acts as a therapeutic tool, which is effective and reliable, according to the research.
Dr Patchick said including patients' perspectives is important for understanding if a treatment has been effective, and PRECiS provides a way to measure this in cognitive rehabilitation.
When someone suffers a stroke, it's likely that they will experience problems with thinking and understanding, which can mean they have difficulties with their memory, attention, speech and many other areas of everyday life.
These cognitive impairments can also have an impact on a person's confidence and ability to recover from their trauma. However, there are limited tools that can help them in this area, but the new study suggests PRECiS could be an effective resource.
"It asks not just whether you have a cognitive problem, but whether that problem is bothering you and affecting your life," Dr Patchick explained.
She said the study shows some positive findings for how PRECiS can be used to measure these skills and indicates a number of "exciting future avenues to explore". However, she added that there is more research needed to better understand how it works for different people, as well as its clinical value.

 

Tuesday, January 26, 2016

Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis

This is completely true in stroke. So much so that I wonder if our researchers even read other research in the field.
http://www.mdlinx.com/internal-medicine/medical-news-article/2016/01/26/lung-cancer/6505672/?newsdt=012616&subspec_id=0&utm_source=DailyNL&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_content=general-article&utm_campaign=article-section&category=daily-digest&page_id=1
Multiple treatments are frequently available for a given condition, and clinicians and patients need a comprehensive, up–to–date synthesis of evidence for all competing treatments. Authors aimed to quantify the waste of research related to the failure of systematic reviews to provide a complete and up–to–date evidence synthesis over time. They illustrate how systematic reviews of a given condition provide a fragmented, out–of–date panorama of the evidence for all treatments. This waste of research might be reduced by the development of live cumulative network meta–analyses.

Methods

  • Authors performed a series of systematic overviews and networks of randomized trials assessing the gap between evidence covered by systematic reviews and available trials of second–line treatments for advanced non–small cell lung cancer.
  • They searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other resources sequentially by year from 2009 to March 2, 2015.
  • They sequentially compared the amount of evidence missing from systematic reviews to the randomized evidence available for inclusion each year.
  • They constructed cumulative networks of randomized evidence over time and evaluated the proportion of trials, patients, treatments, and treatment comparisons not covered by systematic reviews on December 31 each year from 2009 to 2015.

Results

  • They identified 77 trials (28,636 patients) assessing 47 treatments with 54 comparisons and 29 systematic reviews (13 published after 2013).
  • From 2009 to 2015, the evidence covered by existing systematic reviews was consistently incomplete: 45 % to 70 % of trials; 30 % to 58 % of patients; 40 % to 66 % of treatments; and 38 % to 71 % of comparisons were missing.
  • In the cumulative networks of randomized evidence, 10 % to 17 % of treatment comparisons were partially covered by systematic reviews and 55 % to 85 % were partially or not covered.

13 Signs You Are Sleep Deprived, And Need A Nap Immediately

Is your doctor doing anything with your sleep protocol other than having the nurses feed you sleeping pills? And do sleeping pills cause real sleep?
You need sleep:

The Role of Sleep in Motor Sequence Consolidation: Stabilization Rather Than Enhancement

How Sleep After Learning Enhances Memory - stroke considerations

One more reason to get a good night’s sleep - Jeff Iliff Neuroscientist 

How sleep acts as a cleaning system for the brain

http://www.bustle.com/articles/136106-13-signs-you-are-sleep-deprived-and-need-a-nap-immediately 

 

 

 

Minnesota Dept. of Heath Stroke program

And they are doing it all wrong.
Greetings! The Minnesota Stroke Program staff at MDH would like to wish you all a happy start to 2016 and provide an update on our many stroke initiatives.
  • Minnesota Stroke System. As of January 1, 2016, MDH has designated 92 facilities as acute stroke ready hospitals, primary stroke centers, or comprehensive stroke centers. Several more are building their stroke capacities as they prepare to apply for designation. This year we will be working with many facilities to achieve designation and with others to continue improving their stroke programs. In addition, we will be working with EMS agencies to update their protocols to incorporate appropriate transport to state designated stroke hospitals.
  • Minnesota Stroke Registry. All Minnesota acute treatment hospitals submit two stroke measures for statewide quality of care(Why not results) reporting requirements into the Minnesota Stroke Registry. 62 facilities are also submitting additional data to participate in the CDC Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry. We continue to work with hospitals on meeting reporting requirements as well as utilizing these data to improve their care practices.

    Last summer, MDH received funding from CDC and the state general fund to support our program and many new (and old) activities:
    • We are planning a stroke public awareness campaign for Minnesota. Stay tuned about this.
    • We are conducting three transitions of care pilot projects, working on improving outcomes of patients after they are discharged from the hospital.
    • MDH is convening the Minnesota Stroke Council Executive Committee for the first time later this winter. This group will be serving to monitor and advise MDH on our stroke initiatives.
    • Join the Minnesota Stroke Coordinators Group, which meets quarterly to network and learn from one another. For information, contact Megan Hicks at megan.hicks@state.mn.us.
    • Save the Date: Minnesota Stroke Conference, June 6, 2016. Summer is just a heartbeat away!

Finally, please take note of MDH- hosted and co-sponsored stroke events listed in the attached 2016 calendar. Please also see the attached informational sheets to learn more about our major initiatives and our MDH team. For more information, please contact us at health.stroke@state.mn.us or call (651) 201-5413.


Thanks, and have a great 2016!

Walking training with cueing of cadence improves walking speed and stride length after stroke more than walking training alone: a systematic review

How long before your hospital puts this into practice? A great stroke association would be monitoring this and calling presidents that don't implement new stuff in a reasonable amount of time, say one month. This is non-negotiable.
http://www.journalofphysiotherapy.com/article/S1836-9553%2814%2900163-5/pdf

Lessons for major system change: centralization of stroke services in two metropolitan areas of England

Not one word on how these changes improve results. Complete failure and you as stroke survivors have to scream bloody murder.
http://hsr.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/01/22/1355819615626189.long
  1. Simon Turner1,2
  2. Angus Ramsay1
  3. Catherine Perry3
  4. Ruth Boaden4
  5. Christopher McKevitt5
  6. Stephen Morris6
  7. Nanik Pursani7
  8. Anthony Rudd8
  9. Pippa Tyrrell9
  10. Charles Wolfe10
  11. Naomi Fulop11
  1. 1Senior Research Associate, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
  2. 2Senior Research Associate, National Institute of Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care North Thames, London, UK
  3. 3Research Associate, Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  4. 4Professor of Service Operations Management, Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  5. 5Professor of Social Sciences & Health, Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King’s College London and National Institute of Health Research Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, London, UK
  6. 6Professor of Health Economics, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, UK
  7. 7Patient Representative, King’s College London Stroke Research Patients and Family Group, Division of Health & Social Care Research, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
  8. 8Professor of Stroke Medicine, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK and National Clinical Director of Stroke, NHS England, and London Stroke Clinical Director, UK
  9. 9Professor of Stroke Medicine, Stroke & Vascular Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford Royal Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
  10. 10Professor of Public Health Medicine, Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King’s College London, National Institute of Health Research Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, and National Institute of Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London, London, UK
  11. 11Professor of Health Care Organisation and Management, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
  1. Simon Turner, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK. Email: simon.j.turner@ucl.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives Our aim was to identify the factors influencing the selection of a model of acute stroke service centralization to create fewer high-volume specialist units in two metropolitan areas of England (London and Greater Manchester). It considers the reasons why services were more fully centralized in London than in Greater Manchester.
Methods In both areas, we analysed 316 documents and conducted 45 interviews with people leading transformation, service user organizations, providers and commissioners. Inductive and deductive analyses were used to compare the processes underpinning change in each area, with reference to propositions for achieving major system change taken from a realist review of the existing literature (the Best framework), which we critique and develop further.
Results In London, system leadership was used to overcome resistance to centralization and align stakeholders to implement a centralized service model. In Greater Manchester, programme leaders relied on achieving change by consensus and, lacking decision-making authority over providers, accommodated rather than challenged resistance by implementing a less radical transformation of services.
Conclusions A combination of system (top-down) and distributed (bottom-up) leadership is important in enabling change. System leadership provides the political authority required to coordinate stakeholders and to capitalize on clinical leadership by aligning it with transformation goals. Policy makers should examine how the structures of system authority, with performance management and financial levers, can be employed to coordinate transformation by aligning the disparate interests of providers and commissioners.

Influence of essential amino acids on muscle mass and muscle strength in patients with cerebral stroke during early rehabilitation: protocol and rationale of a randomized clinical trial (AMINO-Stroke Study)

Have your doctor follow this study and be ready to create a diet stroke protocol if successful. I'm sure this will fall by the wayside regardless of result because we have NO stroke leadership or strategy.
Is your doctor even measuring your muscle wasting?

New technique helps determine degree of muscle wasting in critically ill patients

Influence of essential amino acids on muscle mass and muscle strength in patients with cerebral stroke during early rehabilitation: protocol and rationale of a randomized clinical trial (AMINO-Stroke Study)

  • Nadja ScherbakovView ORCID ID profile,
  • Nicole Ebner,
  • Anja Sandek,
  • Andreas Meisel,
  • Karl Georg Haeusler,
  • Stephan von Haehling,
  • Stefan D. Anker,
  • Ulrich Dirnagl,
  • Michael Joebges and
  • Wolfram DoehnerEmail author
BMC NeurologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:10
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-016-0531-5
Received: 24 October 2015
Accepted: 14 January 2016
Published: 22 January 2016

Abstract

Background

Patients with stroke are at a high risk for long-term handicap and disability. In the first weeks after stroke muscle wasting is observed frequently. Early post-stroke rehabilitation programs are directed to improve functional independence and physical performance. Supplementation with essential amino acids (EAAs) might prevent muscle wasting and improve rehabilitation outcome by augmenting muscle mass and muscle strength. We aim to examine this in a double blinded, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Methods

Patients with ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke will be enrolled at begin of the early post-stroke rehabilitation in a parallel group interventional trial. Oral supplementation of EAAs or placebo will be given for 12 weeks in a double blinded manner. Physical and functional performance will be assessed by exercise testing before supplementation of EAAs as well as at discharge from the in-patient rehabilitation, at 12 weeks and 1 year afterwards.

Discussion

This is the first randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical study aiming to assess the effect of the EAAs supplementation on muscle strength, muscle function and physical performance in stroke patients during early post-stroke rehabilitation. Supplementation of EAAs could prevent muscle mass wasting and improve functional independence after stroke.

Trial registration

The study is registered at the German registry for clinical trials as well as at World Health Organization (WHO; number DRKS00005577).

Keywords

Double blinded randomized study Post-stroke rehabilitation Skeletal muscle wasting Physical performance Essential amino acids

Background

Long-term disability and functional dependency are the main complications after stroke. Impaired skeletal muscle innervation due to damage results in the degeneration of motor units, paresis, and immobility accompanied by skeletal muscle atrophy [14]. Notably, loss of muscle mass and muscle function, defined as sarcopenia, have been originally described as a phenomenon of aging [5]. However, muscle wasting observed in stroke patients is a disease-related phenomenon and the term ‘stroke-related sarcopenia’ has been suggested [1]. The aetiology of sarcopenia is multifactorial [6]. This is also true for stroke-depended sarcopenia. Several pathophysiological mechanisms including metabolic imbalance, inactivity, malnutrition, and inflammation may contribute to the reduction of muscle mass after stroke [7, 8]. Stroke-related muscle wasting is accompanied by body weight loss, neuro-hormonal activation, and a systemic shift towards catabolic over-activation [8]. In addition, activation of catabolic pathways in the skeletal muscle of the paretic and non-paretic limbs has been observed in experimental stroke [9].
Early rehabilitation has a great impact on the functional recovery after stroke. A previous study showed that 80 % of the patients achieve best functional recovery within 6 weeks after stroke, and after 12.5 weeks 95 % of all stroke patients completed their functional recovery [10]. However, one year after stroke more than 30 % of the patients remained functionally dependent [11].
Skeletal muscles play a central role in post-stroke rehabilitation. The goal of rehabilitation is to restore functional muscle capacity and to prevent long-term disability. Therefore, prevention of muscle wasting, increasing muscle strength, reactive development of novel neuromuscular junctions, and stabilisation of the catabolic-anabolic imbalance are primary aims of post-stroke rehabilitation.
Nutritional intervention may contribute to the improvement of muscle bulk and functional capacity in the early post-stroke rehabilitation. Thus, a beneficial effect of dietary supplementation of essential amino acids (EAAs) has been shown for an improvement of skeletal muscle mass and function in the elderly [12, 13]. Availability of EAAs is regarded as a limiting step in the synthesis of new muscle proteins [14]. Previously it has been shown that supplementation of EAAs in the elderly was responsible for amino acid-induced stimulation of muscle protein anabolism [15]. Therefore, an individually adjusted rehabilitation program that includes physical, functional and neuropsychological training as well as dietary supplementation of the EAA might provide the best rehabilitation outcome. Thus, in the present clinical trial the following hypotheses will be tested:
  • Oral uptake of EAAs restores skeletal muscle function and physical performance;
  • Oral uptake of EAAs contributes to physical independence and enhances the effectiveness of post-stroke rehabilitation;
  • Availability of EAAs reduces muscle wasting after stroke.
We aim to demonstrate that nutritional supplementation with biologically limited available EAAs (l-leucine, l-lysine, l-isoleucine, l-valine, l-threonine, l-cystine, l-histidin, l-phenylalanine, l-methionine, l-tyrosin, and l-tryptophane), in synergy with individually adjusted physical training prevent muscle wasting after stroke and improve the effect of post-stroke early rehabilitation.

More at link