Well, I guess I don't have to worry I was 50 at my stroke. Ok they have identified a possible problem(quantify risks) but it is pretty much useless with no solution provided. And their mentors and senior researchers allowed such useless research to go ahead.
Young Stroke Survivors With No Early Recurrence at High Long‐Term Risk of Adverse Outcomes
Originally published19 Dec 2018https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010370Journal of the American Heart Association. 2018;8:e010370
Abstract
Background
Approximately 8% to 21% of strokes affect adults aged <45 years. Although early stroke recurrence conveys the largest risk, long‐term risks for young survivors with no early complications are unclear.Methods and Results
Longitudinal matched case‐control study (2003–2013). Consecutive patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (young, ≤44 years) discharged from emergency or regional stroke centers in Ontario, Canada, with no death, recurrent stroke/transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, all‐cause hospitalization, or admission to a long‐term or continuing care facility (≤90 days) were matched 10:1 to general population controls on age (±1 year), sex, income, geography, and case date (±50 days). The primary outcome was a composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and long‐term or continuing care facility admission at 1, 3, and 5 years. Absolute event rates for young stroke/transient ischemic attack patients were lower than for older patients at 1 (2.2% versus 9.9%), 3 (4.7% versus 24.6%), and 5 (7.1% versus 37.2%) years. However, piecewise constant hazard modeling revealed that, even after adjustment for vascular comorbidities, young patients showed a 7‐fold increased hazard of the composite outcome compared with young controls at 1 year (hazard ratio, 7.3; 95% CI, 4.0–13.6). Adjusted 5‐year piecewise hazard also remained >5× that of young controls (hazard ratio, 5.2; 95% CI, 2.8–9.4), compared with a 30% increase at 5 years for older patients (hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.3–1.4).Conclusions
Young stable stroke/transient ischemic attack survivors show a higher long‐term hazard of adverse outcomes compared with matched controls than older patients. Findings support the need for long‐term follow‐up and aggressive risk reduction in young survivors and suggest secondary prevention guidelines for these patients are required.Clinical Perspective
What Is New?
- This study provides new evidence that long‐term risks of major vascular events and adverse complications are elevated for young stroke survivors, even if they are clinically stable in the early high‐risk period after stroke/transient ischemic attack.
What Are the Clinical Implications?
- This work has implications for the management of young stroke/transient ischemic attack patients, supporting aggressive long‐term risk reduction, and suggests that guidelines for secondary prevention in these young high‐risk patients are required.
No comments:
Post a Comment