Treatment Effects of Upper Limb Action Observation Therapy and Mirror Therapy on Rehabilitation Outcomes after Subacute Stroke: A Pilot Study

 Using Fugl-Meyer as a measurement tool means this is not objectively measured so not repeatable.  Your doctor will need to get the protocol for this anyway.  See the email for how to contact. There is absolutely no fucking excuse for your doctor to not accomplish this.  Or, I suppose you could let your doctor continue to be incompetent with no consequences.

Treatment Effects of Upper Limb Action Observation Therapy and Mirror Therapy on Rehabilitation Outcomes after Subacute Stroke: A Pilot Study

 Yu-Wei Hsieh ,1,2,3 Yu-Hsuan Lin,4 Jun-Ding Zhu ,1 Ching-Yi Wu ,1,2,3 Yun-Ping Lin,5 and Chih-Chi Chen3,6 1Department of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan 2Healthy Aging Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan 3Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan 4Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan 5Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, New Taipei City, Taiwan 6School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Correspondence should be addressed to Yu-Wei Hsieh; ywhsieh@mail.cgu.edu.tw Received 19 July 2019; Revised 18 November 2019; Accepted 12 December 2019; Published 2 January 2020
Academic Editor: Luigi Trojano
Copyright © 2020 Yu-Wei Hsieh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background. 
Action observation therapy and mirror therapy, two promising rehabilitation strategies, are aimed at enhancing the motor learning and functional improvement of stroke patients through different patterns of visual feedback and observation.
Objective. 
This study investigated and compared the treatment effects of the action observation therapy, mirror therapy, and active control intervention on motor and functional outcomes of stroke patients. Methods. 
Twenty-one patients with subacute stroke were recruited in this study. All patients were randomly assigned to the action observation therapy, mirror therapy, or active control intervention for 3 weeks. Outcome measures were conducted at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, and secondary outcomes included the Box and Block Test, Functional Independence Measure, and Stroke Impact Scale. Descriptive analyses and the number of patients whose change score achieved minimal clinically important difference were reported.
Results. 
Both the action observation therapy and active control intervention showed similar improvements on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Box and Block Test, and Stroke Impact Scale. Moreover, the action observation therapy had a greater improvement on the Functional Independence Measure than the other 2 groups did. However, the mirror therapy group gained the least improvements on the outcomes.
Conclusion. 
The preliminary results found that the patients in the action observation therapy and active control intervention groups had comparable benefits, suggesting that the 2 treatments might be used as an alternative to each other. A further large-scale study with at least 20 patients in each group to validate the study findings is needed. This trial is registered with NCT02871700.