Accuracy of the Australian national subacute and nonacute patient classification in predicting rehabilitation length of stay for stroke survivors who are ≥65 years of age and have lateropulsion

 Survivors don't give a shit about length of stay, they want to know how the fuck you're going to get them 100% recovered! And your mentors and senior researchers approved this useless crapola?

Lateropulsion is pusher syndrome, yep this is more difficult to recover from but your doctor should have protocols for it if competent at all.

Accuracy of the Australian national subacute and nonacute patient classification in predicting rehabilitation length of stay for stroke survivors who are ≥65 years of age and have lateropulsion

Jessica Nolan

,

Erin Godecke

,

Katrina Spilsbury

,

Andy Wu

&

Barbara Singer

Received 08 May 2021, Accepted 12 Nov 2021, Published online: 04 Jan 2022

• Download citation
• https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2021.2008594
•   CrossMark

 ABSTRACT

Background

Lateropulsion is a common impairment after stroke. Regardless of stroke severity, functional recovery is slower in people with lateropulsion, resulting in requirement for longer rehabilitation duration. In Australia, inpatient rehabilitation funding is determined via the Australian National Sub-Acute and Non-Acute Patient Classification (AN-SNAP). AN-SNAP class is determined using age, diagnosis, weighted Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor score, and FIM cognitive score.

Objectives

To explore accuracy of the AN-SNAP to predict length of stay (LOS) for people with poststroke lateropulsion.

Methods

A retrospective database audit was undertaken. AN-SNAP predicted LOS for each participant was calculated based on 2019 calendar year national benchmarks. A multivariable linear regression model estimated mean differences in reported LOS and AN-SNAP predicted LOS after adjusting for lateropulsion severity (Four Point Pusher Score). A separate logistic regression model assessed whether FIM change during admission was associated with reported LOS exceeding AN-SNAP predicted LOS.

Results

Data were available from 1126 admissions. Reported LOS exceeding AN-SNAP predicted LOS was associated with greater lateropulsion severity on admission. Where AN-SNAP predicted LOS was longer, those with no lateropulsion on admission showed shorter reported than predicted LOS. Greater improvement in FIM during rehabilitation was associated with increased odds of reported LOS exceeding AN-SNAP predicted LOS (OR 1.02, 95%CI 1.01–1.03, p < .001).

Conclusions

Inclusion of a measure of poststroke lateropulsion in the AN-SNAP classification model would result in more accurate LOS predictions to inform funding. Costs of longer rehabilitation LOS may be countered by optimized long-term physical function, reducing requirement for ongoing care.