http://www.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00728/full?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Neuroscience-w46-2013
- Clinical Neuropsychology Research Group (EKN), Bogenhausen University Hospital, Munich, Germany
A commentary on
The influence of prism adaptation on perceptual and motor components of neglect: a reply to Saevarsson and Kristjánsson
The influence of prism adaptation on perceptual and motor components of neglect: a reply to Saevarsson and Kristjánsson
by Striemer, C. L., and Danckert, J. (2013). Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:255. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00255
Dissociating perceptual and motor effects of prism adaptation in spatial neglect
By Striemer, C., and Danckert, J. (2010a). Neuroreport 21, 436–441. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328338592f
By Striemer, C., and Danckert, J. (2010a). Neuroreport 21, 436–441. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328338592f
Through a prism darkly: re-evaluating prisms and neglect
By Striemer, C., and Danckert, J. (2010b). Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 308–316. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.001
By Striemer, C., and Danckert, J. (2010b). Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 308–316. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.001
Striemer and Danckert (2010a)
suggest that prism adaptation (PA) has beneficial effects primarily on
spatial attention and the motor components of neglect, and that the
direct effects on visual neglect are insignificant. The main support for
their influential hypothesis (e.g., Saj et al., 2013) comes from their own study (Striemer and Danckert, 2010b), but Saevarsson and Kristjánsson (2013) criticize their interpretations, and call for another possible evaluation of their data. Striemer and Danckert (2013)
reply to this criticism; however, there are a number of controversial
and fundamental issues that remain unresolved in this debate which
future empirical studies need to consider, to explain “how PA remediates
symptoms of neglect” (Striemer and Danckert, 2013, p. 2).
Your doctor can read the rest at the link including references.
No comments:
Post a Comment