Single Session of Dual-tDCS Transiently Improves Precision Grip and Dexterity of the Paretic Hand After Stroke

One session and I still bet your doctor will not be doing this for 50 years.

Single Session of Dual-tDCS Transiently Improves Precision Grip and Dexterity of the Paretic Hand After Stroke

1. Stéphanie Lefebvre1,2
2. Jean-Louis Thonnard, PhD2
3. Patrice Laloux, MD, PhD1,2
4. André Peeters, MD3
5. Jacques Jamart, MD, MSc1
6. Yves Vandermeeren, MD, PhD1,2

1. ¹Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Yvoir, Belgium
2. ²Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Brussels, Belgium
3. ³Unité Neuro-Vasculaire, Service de Neurologie, Bruxelles, Belgium

1. Yves Vandermeeren, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, CHU Mont-Godinne, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Dr G Therasse, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium. Email: yves.vandermeeren@uclouvain.be

Abstract

Background. 

 

After stroke, deregulated interhemispheric interactions influence residual paretic hand function. Anodal or cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can rebalance these abnormal interhemispheric interactions and improve motor function.  

Objective. 

 

We explored whether dual-hemisphere tDCS (dual-tDCS) in participants with chronic stroke can improve fine hand motor function in 2 important aspects: precision grip and dexterity. Methods. In all, 19 chronic hemiparetic individuals with mild to moderate impairment participated in a double-blind, randomized trial. During 2 separate cross-over sessions (real/sham), they performed 10 precision grip movements with a manipulandum and the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) before, during, immediately after, and 20 minutes after dual-tDCS applied simultaneously over the ipsilesional (anodal) and contralateral (cathodal) primary motor cortices.  

 

Results. 

 

The precision grip performed with the paretic hand improved significantly 20 minutes after dual-tDCS, with reduction of the grip force/load force ratio by 7% and in the preloading phase duration by 18% when compared with sham. The dexterity of the paretic hand started improving during dual-tDCS and culminated 20 minutes after the end of dual-tDCS (PPT score +38% vs +5% after sham). The maximal improvements in precision grip and dexterity were observed 20 minutes after dual-tDCS. These improvements correlated negatively with residual hand function quantified with ABILHAND.  

Conclusions. 

 

One bout of dual-tDCS improved the motor control of precision grip and digital dexterity beyond the time of stimulation. These results suggest that dual-tDCS should be tested in longer protocols for neurorehabilitation and with moderate to severely impaired patients. The precise timing of stimulation after stroke onset and associated training should be defined.