Useless. Measurements DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TOWARDS RECOVERY. I'd fire you all. Does no one in stroke understand survivors want recovery? Not predictions of failure to recover or measurements of useless shit like this.
Psychometric Properties of a New Measure of Upper Limb Performance in Post-Stroke Individuals: Trunk-Based Index of Performance
Abstract
Background
Several
measures of upper limb (UL) motor tasks have been developed to
characterize recovery. However, UL performance and movement quality
measures in isolation may not provide a true profile of functional
recovery.
Objective
To
investigate the measurement properties of a new trunk-based Index of
Performance (IPt) of the UL combining endpoint performance (accuracy and
speed) and movement quality (trunk displacement) in stroke.
Methods
Participants
with stroke (n = 25, mean time since stroke: 18.7 ± 17.2 months)
performed a reaching task over 3 evaluation sessions. The IPt was
computed based on Fitts’ Law that incorporated endpoint accuracy and
speed corrected by the amount of trunk displacement. Test–retest
reliability was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
and Bland–Altman plots. Standard error of measurement (SEM) and Minimal
Detectable Change (MDC) were determined. Validity was investigated
through the relationship between IPt, Fugl–Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE),
and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), as well as the ability of IPt to
distinguish between levels of UL motor impairment severity.
Results
Test–retest
reliability was excellent (ICC = .908, 95% CI: 0.807-0.96).
Bland–Altman did not show systematic differences. SEM and MDC95 were 14% and 39%, respectively. Construct validity was satisfactory. The IPt showed low-to-moderate relationships with FMA-UE (R2 ranged from .236 to .428) and ARAT (R2 ranged from .277 to .306). IPt scores distinguished between different levels of UL severity.
Conclusions
The
IPt showed evidence of good reliability, and initial validity. The IPt
may be a promising tool for research and clinical settings. Further
research is warranted to investigate its validity with additional
comparator instruments.
No comments:
Post a Comment