Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Thursday, February 2, 2023

Psychometric Properties of a New Measure of Upper Limb Performance in Post-Stroke Individuals: Trunk-Based Index of Performance

Useless. Measurements DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TOWARDS RECOVERY. I'd fire you all.  Does no one in stroke understand survivors want recovery?  Not predictions of failure to recover or measurements of useless shit like this.

Psychometric Properties of a New Measure of Upper Limb Performance in Post-Stroke Individuals: Trunk-Based Index of Performance

Abstract

Background

Several measures of upper limb (UL) motor tasks have been developed to characterize recovery. However, UL performance and movement quality measures in isolation may not provide a true profile of functional recovery.

Objective

To investigate the measurement properties of a new trunk-based Index of Performance (IPt) of the UL combining endpoint performance (accuracy and speed) and movement quality (trunk displacement) in stroke.

Methods

Participants with stroke (n = 25, mean time since stroke: 18.7 ± 17.2 months) performed a reaching task over 3 evaluation sessions. The IPt was computed based on Fitts’ Law that incorporated endpoint accuracy and speed corrected by the amount of trunk displacement. Test–retest reliability was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots. Standard error of measurement (SEM) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) were determined. Validity was investigated through the relationship between IPt, Fugl–Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE), and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), as well as the ability of IPt to distinguish between levels of UL motor impairment severity.

Results

Test–retest reliability was excellent (ICC = .908, 95% CI: 0.807-0.96). Bland–Altman did not show systematic differences. SEM and MDC95 were 14% and 39%, respectively. Construct validity was satisfactory. The IPt showed low-to-moderate relationships with FMA-UE (R2 ranged from .236 to .428) and ARAT (R2 ranged from .277 to .306). IPt scores distinguished between different levels of UL severity.

Conclusions

The IPt showed evidence of good reliability, and initial validity. The IPt may be a promising tool for research and clinical settings. Further research is warranted to investigate its validity with additional comparator instruments.

No comments:

Post a Comment