http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/18/2/455/htm
Rats
1
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
2
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
*
Correspondence; Tel.: +86-20-8217-9022; Fax: +86-20-8525-2753
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Academic Editor:
Irmgard Tegeder
Received: 16 November 2016 / Accepted: 10 February 2017 / Published: 20 February 2017
Abstract:
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
(rTMS) has rapidly become an attractive therapeutic approach for stroke.
However, the mechanisms underlying this remain elusive. This study
aimed to investigate whether high-frequency rTMS improves functional
recovery mediated by enhanced neurogenesis and activation of
brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)/tropomyosin-related kinase B
(TrkB) pathway and to compare the effect of conventional 20 Hz rTMS and
intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) on ischemic rats. Rats after
rTMS were sacrificed seven and 14 days after middle cerebral artery
occlusion (MCAO), following evaluation of neurological function.
Neurogenesis was measured using specific markers: Ki67, Nestin,
doublecortin (DCX), NeuN and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and
the expression levels of BDNF were visualized by Western blotting and
RT-PCR analysis. Both high-frequency rTMS methods significantly improved
neurological function and reduced infarct volume. Moreover, 20 Hz rTMS
and iTBS significantly promoted neurogenesis, shown by an increase of
Ki67/DCX, Ki67/Nestin, and Ki67/NeuN-positive cells in the peri-infarct
striatum. These beneficial effects were accompanied by elevated protein
levels of BDNF and phosphorylated-TrkB. In conclusion, high-frequency
rTMS improves functional recovery possibly by enhancing neurogenesis and
activating BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway and conventional 20 Hz rTMS is
better than iTBS at enhancing neurogenesis in ischemic rats.
Keywords:
rTMS; neurological function; neural stem cells; BDNF; TrkB; MCAO1. Introduction
Stroke
is a major cause of neurological disability that leads to serious
clinical consequences. It has been estimated that 90% of stroke
survivors suffer permanent neurological deficits [1]. At present, rehabilitation therapy is the best approach for treating neurological deficits after stroke [2].
However, it is not ideal because most stroke survivors remain
neurologically impaired after rehabilitation. Thus, there is an urgent
need for the development of novel approaches to stroke rehabilitation.
One promising strategy for stroke rehabilitation is to enhance
endogenous pathways that support restoration after brain damage [3]. Neural stem cell (NSC) plays a key role in endogenous restoration following stroke [4].
NSC persists in the rostral subventricular zone (SVZ) and subgranular
zone (SGZ) of the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG) throughout life in
mammals [5]. More importantly, NSC can proliferate and migrate into damaged brain regions following ischemic stroke [3,4,6]. Therefore, the promotion of endogenous neurogenesis is an attractive strategy for stroke rehabilitation.
Repetitive
transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive
neuromodulatory technique which affects brain physiology through
magnetic pulses. Different rTMS techniques have been applied to stroke
rehabilitation [7],
and, interestingly, they can produce different modulatory effects. For
example, high-frequency rTMS (>5 Hz) stimulates cortical excitability
and generates long-term potentiation (LTP)-like effects. In contrast,
low-frequency rTMS (<1 Hz) reduces cortical excitability and produces
long-term depression (LTD) [8]. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a novel form of high-frequency rTMS [9].
Conventional high-frequency rTMS procedures last between 20 and 45 min,
as compared to TBS paradigms that require 1 to 3 min of stimulation [10].
Recently, some studies have suggested that iTBS applied to the
ipsilateral side of human or animals has similar or better efficacy in
treating stroke compared to conventional rTMS [11,12].
Whether iTBS is better than conventional high-frequency rTMS on
improvement of functional recovery in ischemic rats is still unknown.
Moreover, it is reported that high-frequency rTMS enhances neurogenesis
in ischemic rats [13]. However, the underlying mechanism remains elusive.
One
possible mechanism might be an increase in the expression of
brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) after high-frequency rTMS [14].
BDNF is a member of the neurotrophin family, which has recently been
shown to play a role both in protection and in recovery of function
after stroke [15]. BDNF promotes NSC migration and proliferation via its receptor, tropomyosin-related kinase B (TrkB) [16,17].
Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether the beneficial
effect of rTMS on functional recovery is mediated via enhanced
neurogenesis and activation of the BDNF-TrkB signaling pathway and to
compare the effect of conventional 20 Hz rTMS and iTBS on neurogenesis
in ischemic rats
No comments:
Post a Comment