Cost-Effectiveness of Tenecteplase Before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke

Oh fuck, the stupidity of it all. 'COST' NOT RESULTS OR ANYTHING USEFUL TO SURVIVORS. That is where the stroke medical world is at, not solving stroke, concerned about cost. FUCK THEM, THEY ALL NEED TO BE FIRED!

Cost-Effectiveness of Tenecteplase Before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke

 

Lan Gao

,

Marj Moodie

,

Peter J. Mitchell

,

Leonid Churilov

,

Timothy J. Kleinig

,

Nawaf Yassi

,

Bernard Yan

,

Mark W. Parsons

,

Geoffrey A. Donnan

,

Stephen M. Davis

, … See all authors

Originally published7 Oct 2020https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029666Stroke. 2020;51:3681–3689

Abstract

Background and Purpose:

Tenecteplase improved functional outcomes and reduced the requirement for endovascular thrombectomy in ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion in the EXTEND-IA TNK randomized trial. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of tenecteplase versus alteplase in this trial.

Methods:

Post hoc within-trial economic analysis included costs of index emergency department and inpatient stroke hospitalization, rehabilitation/subacute care, and rehospitalization due to stroke within 90 days. Sources for cost included key study site complemented by published literature and government websites. Quality-adjusted life-years were estimated using utility scores derived from the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. Long-term modeled cost-effectiveness analysis used a Markov model with 7 health states corresponding to 7 modified Rankin Scale scores. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results:

Within the 202 patients in the randomized controlled trial, total cost was nonsignificantly lower in the tenecteplase-treated patients (40 997 Australian dollars [AUD]) compared with alteplase-treated patients (46 188 AUD) for the first 90 days(P=0.125). Tenecteplase was the dominant treatment strategy in the short term, with similar cost (5412 AUD [95% CI, −13 348 to 2523]; P=0.181) and higher benefits (0.099 quality-adjusted life-years [95% CI, 0.001–0.1967]; P=0.048), with a 97.4% probability of being cost-effective. In the long-term, tenecteplase was associated with less additional lifetime cost (96 357 versus 106 304 AUD) and greater benefits (quality-adjusted life-years, 7.77 versus 6.48), and had a 100% probability of being cost-effective. Both deterministic sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analyses yielded similar results.

Conclusions:

Both within-trial and long-term economic analyses showed that tenecteplase was highly likely to be cost-effective for patients with acute stroke before thrombectomy. Recommending the use of tenecteplase over alteplase could lead to a cost saving to the healthcare system both in the short and long term.

Registration:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02388061.