Do you not understand that research is supposed to solve stroke? Describing a problem with no solution is totally fucking useless. I'd fire anyone associated with this.
Venous outflow profiles are associated with early edema progression in ischemic stroke
Abstract
Background:
In patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS–LVO), development of extensive early ischemic brain edema is associated with poor functional outcomes, despite timely treatment. Robust cortical venous outflow (VO) profiles correlate with favorable tissue perfusion. We hypothesized that favorable VO profiles (VO+) correlate with a reduced early edema progression rate (EPR) and good functional outcomes.
Methods:
Multicenter, retrospective analysis to investigate AIS–LVO patients treated by mechanical thrombectomy between May 2013 and December 2020. Baseline computed tomography angiography (CTA) was used to determine VO using the cortical vein opacification score (COVES); VO+ was defined as COVES ⩾ 3 and unfavorable as COVES ⩽ 2. EPR was determined as the ratio of net water uptake (NWU) on baseline non-contrast CT and time from symptom onset to admission imaging. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess primary (EPR) and secondary outcome (good functional outcomes defined as 0–2 points on the modified Rankin scale).
Results:
A total of 728 patients were included. Primary outcome analysis showed VO+ (β: –0.03, SE: 0.009, p = 0.002), lower presentation National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS; β: 0.002, SE: 0.001, p = 0.002), and decreased time from onset to admission imaging (β: –0.00002, SE: 0.00004, p < 0.001) were independently associated with reduced EPR. VO+ also predicted good functional outcomes (odds ratio (OR): 5.07, 95% CI: 2.839–9.039, p < 0.001), while controlling for presentation NIHSS, time from onset to imaging, general vessel reperfusion, baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, infarct core volume, EPR, and favorable arterial collaterals.
No comments:
Post a Comment