Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, December 8, 2015

Incidence of delayed ipsilateral intraparenchymal hemorrhage after stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms in a high-volume single center

You'll have to be awake and cognitive enough to ask your doctor if they are monitoring you for a hemorrhage after they coil an aneurysm. It has already been noted that strokes in hospitals have worse treatment and outcomes.  Be careful out there.

http://www.docguide.com/incidence-delayed-ipsilateral-intraparenchymal-hemorrhage-after-stent-assisted-coiling-intracranial-?hash=7e422beb&eid=48683&alrhash=3c9ebc-5aeefe0d7ed0a73e6788dca4998df39c

Kayan Y, Almandoz J, Fease J, Tran K, Milner A, Scholz J; Neuroradiology (Nov 2015)

INTRODUCTION Delayed ipsilateral intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH) has been reported following technically successful treatment of intracranial aneurysms using flow-diverting stents in up to 8.5 % of patients. We report a similar, though less frequent phenomenon in the setting of stent-assisted coil embolization.
METHODS Institutional review board approval was obtained. A retrospective analysis of a prospective neurointerventional procedure registry was performed to review all IPHs that occurred in aneurysm patients within 90 days of endovascular treatment performed between November 2002 and November 2014 at one institution. Age, sex, hypertension, dual antiplatelet therapy, and technical details of the procedure were recorded.
RESULTS A total of 1697 patients underwent endovascular treatment of an intracranial aneurysm without a flow diverter at our institution during the study period. Among these, 138 patients underwent stent-assisted coiling (8.1 %). Of these, three patients (2.2 %) suffered a delayed IPH within the vascular territory distal to the treated lesion (one woman, median age 60 years).
CONCLUSIONS Recently described in the setting of flow diversion, delayed ipsilateral IPH is not limited to flow-diverting stents. Though less frequent, a potential for this complication may exist following any intracranial stenting procedure, possibly related to hemorrhagic conversion of microembolic phenomena in the setting of dual antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy.

No comments:

Post a Comment