http://nnr.sagepub.com/content/30/10/941?etoc
- Jongwook Cho1
- Dae-Hyuk Kwon, PhD1
- Ra Gyung Kim1
- Hanlim Song1
- Pedro Rosa-Neto, MD, PhD2
- Min-Cheol Lee, MD, PhD3
- Hyoung-Ihl Kim, MD, PhD1,4⇑
- 1Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
- 2Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, Canada
- 3Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
- 4Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
- Hyoung-Ihl Kim, MD, PhD, Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, 261 Cheomdan-gwagiro, Gwangju, 500-712, South Korea. Email: hyoungihl@gist.ac.kr
Abstract
Background. Subcortical capsular stroke has a poor prognosis, and it is not yet fully understood how and under what circumstances reach
training contributes to motor recovery.
Objective. This study was performed to investigate changes in neuronal circuits and motor recovery in a chronic capsular stroke model
in the presence or absence of reach training.
Method.
We generated photothrombotic capsular lesions in 42 Sprague-Dawley rats
and evaluated motor recovery with or without daily
training in a single-pellet reaching task (SPRT).
We used 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose-microPET (positron emission
tomography)
to assess remodeling of neuronal circuits.
Results. SPRT training was selectively beneficial only for the group with incomplete capsular destruction (P
< .05), suggesting the relevance of plasticity in the remaining
capsular fibers for motor recovery. Groups that did not receive
SPRT training showed no motor recovery at all. The
microPET analysis demonstrated that motor recovery was correlated with
a reduction in cortical diaschisis in ipsilesional
motor and sensory cortices and in the contralesional sensory cortex
(Pearson’s
correlation, P < .05). We also observed training-dependent subcortical activation in the contralesional red nucleus, the internal capsule,
and the ventral hippocampus (P < .0025; false discovery rate q < 0.05). The groups without reach training did not show the same degree of reduction in diaschisis or activation of the red
nucleus.
Conclusions. Our results suggest
that motor recovery and remodeling of neuronal circuits after capsular
stroke depend on the magnitude
of the capsular lesion and on the presence or
absence of reach training. Task-specific training is strongly indicated
only
when there is incomplete destruction of the
capsular fibers.
No comments:
Post a Comment