Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there. Did your doctor somehow miss the recovery protocol that Pedro Bach-y-Rita used to recover fully back in 1958 with only a partial brain?

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, March 26, 2018

Antibody removes Alzheimer's plaques, in mice

You will need this, so what the fuck is your doctor doing to get this researched in humans? ANYTHING AT ALL? Or is your doctor and stroke hospital sitting on their asses waiting for SOMEONE ELSE TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM? Or maybe waiting for YOU to solve the problem?

Your chances of getting dementia.

1. A documented 33% dementia chance post-stroke from an Australian study?   May 2012.
2. Then this study came out and seems to have a range from 17-66%. December 2013.
3. A 20% chance in this research.   July 2013.
 

Antibody removes Alzheimer's plaques, in mice

 

Years before people start showing characteristic symptoms of Alzheimer's disease, sticky plaques begin forming in their brains, damaging nearby cells. For decades, doctors have sought ways to clear out these plaques as a way to prevent or treat the disease.


The sticky clumps, known as amyloid plaques, are composed primarily of a protein called amyloid beta. But nestled within the plaques are small amounts of another Alzheimer's protein: APOE. Now, researchers at Washington University School of Medicine have shown that an antibody not only targets APOE for removal but sweeps away plaques.
The findings, available March 26 in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, could lead to a way to halt the brain damage triggered by amyloid plaques while the disease is still in its early stages, perhaps before symptoms appear.
"Many people build up amyloid over many years, and the brain just can't get rid of it," said senior author David Holtzman, MD, the Andrew B. and Gretchen P. Jones Professor and head of the Department of Neurology. "By removing plaques, if we start early enough, we may be able to stop the changes to the brain that result in forgetfulness, confusion and cognitive decline."
Variants of the gene APOE are the single largest risk factor for Alzheimer's disease. In earlier work, Holtzman and colleagues have shown that a DNA-based compound that targets APOE can lessen the injury caused by amyloid plaques.
But getting rid of the plaques likely would protect the brain better than blunting the plaques' destructiveness. To find out whether the plaques could be removed, Holtzman, co-first authors Fan Liao, PhD, a postdoctoral researcher, and Aimin Li, PhD, a senior scientist, and colleagues focused on antibodies that recognize and bind to APOE. Once antibodies attach themselves to their APOE target, they attract the attention of roving immune cells, which carry both antibody and target off to be destroyed. The researchers reasoned that nearby amyloid might be cleared away along with APOE.
The researchers tested several antibodies that recognize human APOE in mice genetically predisposed to develop . The APOE genes of the mice had been replaced with a human APOE gene. The antibodies were developed in collaboration with Denali Therapeutics.
For six weeks, the mice were given weekly injections of placebo or antibodies against APOE. Then, the researchers measured the amount of plaques in their brains. One antibody - called HAE-4 - cut the level of plaques by half.
Moreover, HAE-4 had no effect on APOE levels in the blood. APOE plays an important role in transporting fats and cholesterol in the body, so removing it from the bloodstream could create unwanted side effects. The failure of the antibody to lower levels of APOE in the blood was therefore a good sign. But it was also a mystery. Why did the antibody clear APOE from the brain but not the blood?
"It turns out that the APOE in the plaques has a different structure than the form of APOE found in the blood," Holtzman said. "The HAE-4 antibody recognized only the form found attached to the plaques in the brain."
No treatment exists to prevent or delay onset - or slow the trajectory - of Alzheimer's disease. But a few antibodies that clear plaques by targeting are being evaluated in clinical trials. While such antibodies are promising, they sometimes come with the side effect of inflammation and swelling in the brain.
However, antibodies that target APOE may be successful at removing plaques in people and somewhat less likely to trigger a destructive immune response, Holtzman said.
"The anti- antibodies are going to be binding to most of the molecules that are in the , but the anti-APOE antibody would target just a very small component of the plaque," Holtzman said. "This means we may find less immune activation, and we might not see the unwelcome side effects."
The researchers are planning further studies to determine whether similar are safe and might be effective enough to be used in people.

Manchester study finds Drug reduces inflammation in stroke patients

What the hell will it take to get this into widespread use?  I bet our fucking failures of stroke associations will not lift one pinkie to get the word out on this. I don't care that more research is needed, the fact it does this needs to be widely disseminated so that doctors and stroke hospitals know further research is coming. 

Manchester study finds Drug reduces inflammation in stroke patients


An anti-inflammatory drug given to patients in the early stages of a stroke has been shown by researchers at The University of Manchester and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust to reduce harmful inflammation.
The drug, Kineret©, licenced for treating rheumatoid arthritis, was given as a small injection just under the skin without giving the patients any identifiable adverse reactions.
It is one of many biologic agents transforming treatment in a range of illnesses.The protein Interleukin-1 (IL-1) is part of the body’s defences and naturally produced to combat a range of illnesses.
However, scientists at The University of Manchester have previously shown IL-1 increases inflammation and brain injury following a stroke.
Kineret works by blocking the actions of IL-1 which is released into the body following injury caused by a stroke.
The researchers, who have published their findings in the journal Stroke, cannot say for sure at this stage how the reduction in inflammation will impact on clinical outcomes.
The study, funded by the Stroke Association, follows earlier research that shows the drug given as an intravenous therapy reduces inflammation in stroke and sub arachnoid haemorrhage patients.
A stroke occurs when poor blood flow to the brain results in cell death. There are two main types of stroke: ischemic, caused by lack of blood flow, and haemorrhagic, caused by bleeding in the brain.
Stroke is the most common cause of disability in adults and a leading cause of death worldwide.
The Manchester study,a double blind trial where Kineret was tested against placebo – looked at ischemic strokes only.
The 80 Participants in the study -carried out at Salford’s Greater Manchester Stroke Centre at Salford Royal– were given 6 doses of the drug or placebo over three days. The first dose was given within 6 hours after the onset of the stroke symptoms.
Inflammatory markers were measured in the blood before treatment began and during study treatment.
Professor Craig Smith from The University of Manchester is also a stroke physician at Salford Royal.
He said: “Though Strokes affect different people in different ways, for many people they have a devastating effect on their long-term health and wellbeing.
“Excessive inflammation after a stroke is known to be harmful and predicts a worse outcome in patients.”
“We have shown that Kineret injections, started within six hours of stroke onset significantly reduces levels of inflammation in patients.”
Hilary Reynolds, Executive Director of Strategy & Research at the Stroke Association said: “This study builds on evidence that IL-1Ra (Kineret) helps to reduce inflammation and brain damage in a wide range of stroke patients soon after a stroke. The drug can be given quickly, via injection or via a drip. This means that it can be used in different settings, for example, it could potentially be given in ambulances on the way to hospital. The brain loses around 2 million brain cells every minute during a stroke, so this could provide a major step forward in fast and effective treatment of stroke.
“The research has not yet proven that this drug can reduce patient disability after stroke. However, if further trials are successful, we hope it could vastly improve outcomes and quality of life for people who have had a stroke.”
Further research is needed to see whether Kineret is an effective treatment for ischemic stroke and whether it can be given alongside current treatments such as clot-busting drugs (thrombolysis).
The same research team have shown that Kineret reduces inflammation and is safe in patients with bleeding around the brain, a condition known as subarachnoid haemorrhage.
To definitively test if Kineret improves patient outcomes in subarachnoid haemorrhage, a national trial of Kineret in 1000 patients, funded by the Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research, will start in 2018.
And another trial in 80 patients with stroke caused bleeding in the brain, known as intracerebral haemorrhage, will also start in 2018. It is funded by the National Institute for Health Research.
That trial will test if markers of inflammation are reduced by Kineret and test safety in intracerebral haemorrhage.



Projected Temperature-Related Years of Life Lost From Stroke Due To Global Warming in a Temperate Climate City, Asia

Climate change doesn't exist in the United States so no need to worry or understand this.
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/49/4/828?etoc=

Disease Burden Caused by Future Climate Change

Guoxing Li, Qun Guo, Yang Liu, Xiaochuan Pan
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020042
Originally published March 9, 2018

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Abstract

Background and Purpose—Global warming has attracted worldwide attention. Numerous studies have indicated that stroke is associated with temperature; however, few studies are available on the projections of the burden of stroke attributable to future climate change. We aimed to investigate the future trends of stroke years of life lost (YLL) associated with global warming.
Methods—We collected death records to examine YLL in Tianjin, China, from 2006 to 2011. We fitted a standard time-series Poisson regression model after controlling for trends, day of the week, relative humidity, and air pollution. We estimated temperature–YLL associations with a distributed lag nonlinear model. These models were then applied to the local climate projections to estimate temperature-related YLL in the 2050s and 2070s. We projected temperature-related YLL from stroke in Tianjin under 19 global-scale climate models and 3 different greenhouse gas emission scenarios.
Results—The results showed a slight decrease in YLL with percent decreases of 0.85%, 0.97%, and 1.02% in the 2050s and 0.94%, 1.02%, and 0.91% in the 2070s for the 3 scenarios, respectively. The increases in heat-related annual YLL and the decreases in cold-related YLL under the high emission scenario were the strongest. The monthly analysis showed that the most significant increase occurred in the summer months, particularly in August, with percent changes >150% in the 2050s and up to 300% in the 2070s.
Conclusions—Future changes in climate are likely to lead to an increase in heat-related YLL, and this increase will not be offset by adaptation under both medium emission and high emission scenarios. Health protections from hot weather will become increasingly necessary, and measures to reduce cold effects will also remain important.

  • quality control
  • stroke
  • temperature

    • Received November 7, 2017.
    • Revision received
    February 5, 2018.
  • Accepted February 15, 2018.

    • © 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.
    View Full Text

    Role of Blood Lipids in the Development of Ischemic Stroke and its Subtypes

    Hopefully your doctor understands and  conveys what this means to you.

    Role of Blood Lipids in the Development of Ischemic Stroke and its Subtypes


    A Mendelian Randomization Study

    George Hindy, Gunnar Engström, Susanna C. Larsson, Matthew Traylor, Hugh S. Markus, Olle Melander, Marju Orho-Melander
    and on behalf of the Stroke Genetics Network (SiGN)
    Stroke. 2018;49:820-827
    Originally published March 13, 2018

    • Article

  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics

  • Abstract

    Background and Purpose—Statin therapy is associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke supporting a causal role of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. However, more evidence is needed to answer the question whether LDL cholesterol plays a causal role in ischemic stroke subtypes. In addition, it is unknown whether high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides have a causal relationship to ischemic stroke and its subtypes. Our aim was to investigate the causal role of LDL cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides in ischemic stroke and its subtypes through Mendelian randomization (MR).
    Methods—Summary data on 185 genome-wide lipids-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms were obtained from the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium and the Stroke Genetics Network for their association with ischemic stroke (n=16 851 cases and 32 473 controls) and its subtypes, including large artery atherosclerosis (n=2410), small artery occlusion (n=3186), and cardioembolic (n=3427) stroke. Inverse-variance–weighted MR was used to obtain the causal estimates. Inverse-variance–weighted multivariable MR, MR-Egger, and sensitivity exclusion of pleiotropic single nucleotide polymorphisms after Steiger filtering and MR-Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier test were used to adjust for pleiotropic bias.
    Results—A 1-SD genetically elevated LDL cholesterol was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke (odds ratio: 1.12; 95% confidence interval: 1.04–1.20) and large artery atherosclerosis stroke (odds ratio: 1.28; 95% confidence interval: 1.10–1.49) but not with small artery occlusion or cardioembolic stroke in multivariable MR. A 1-SD genetically elevated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was associated with a decreased risk of small artery occlusion stroke (odds ratio: 0.79; 95% confidence interval: 0.67–0.90) in multivariable MR. MR-Egger indicated no pleiotropic bias, and results did not markedly change after sensitivity exclusion of pleiotropic single nucleotide polymorphisms. Genetically elevated triglycerides did not associate with ischemic stroke or its subtypes.
    Conclusions—LDL cholesterol lowering is likely to prevent large artery atherosclerosis but may not prevent small artery occlusion nor cardioembolic strokes. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol elevation may lead to benefits in small artery disease prevention. Finally, triglyceride lowering may not yield benefits in ischemic stroke and its subtypes.

    Information Avoidance

    Is this what your doctor is doing to not have to keep up-to-date on all the stroke research out there? My doctor pooh-poohed the information I brought him on Saebo-flex and Henry Hoffman, did absolutely nothing. He was completely worthless. This would be a great thesis project for a neurologist.
    https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/sds/docs/loewenstein/InfoAvoidance.pdf

    We commonly think of information as a means to an end. However, a growing theo-
    retical and experimental literature suggests that information may directly enter the
    agent’s utility function. This can create an incentive to avoid information, even when it
    is useful, free, and independent of strategic considerations. We review research docu-
    menting the occurrence of information avoidance, as well as theoretical and empirical
    research on reasons why people avoid information, drawing from economics, psy-
    chology, and other disciplines. The review concludes with a discussion of some of the
    diverse (and often costly) individual and societal consequences of information avoid-
    ance.
    (Journal of Economic Literature 2017, 55(1), 96–135
    https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20151245
    )

    Neuroscientists say daily ibuprofen can prevent Alzheimer's disease

    Not to be done for 50 years when all the interactions are known. You likely are taking aspirin already. Ask your doctor what SPECIFIC interventions you need to do to prevent Alzheimers.

    Can You Take Aspirin and Ibuprofen Together? - Healthline

    A dangerous combination. Both aspirin and ibuprofen belong to a drug class called nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). They have similar side effects, and taking them together increases your risk of these side effects. Aspirin and ibuprofen can cause stomach bleeding, especially if you take too much.


    https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-03-neuroscientists-daily-ibuprofen-alzheimer-disease.html

    A Vancouver-based research team led by Canada's most cited neuroscientist, Dr. Patrick McGeer, has successfully carried out studies suggesting that, if started early enough, a daily regimen of the non-prescription NSAID (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) ibuprofen can prevent the onset of Alzheimer's disease. This means that by taking an over-the-counter medication, people can ward off a disease that, according to Alzheimer's Disease International's World Alzheimer Report 2016, affects an estimated 47 million people worldwide, costs health care systems worldwide more than US$818 billion per year and is the fifth leading cause of death in those aged 65 or older.
    The Alzheimer's Association estimates that there are more than 5 million cases in the United States alone, with a new case being identified every 66 seconds. The annual cost to the country in 2017 is estimated have been $259 billion, with that figure predicted to potentially rise to $1.1 trillion by 2050.
    Dr. McGeer, who is President and CEO of Vancouver-based Aurin Biotech, and his wife, Dr. Edith McGeer, are among the most cited neuroscientists in the world. Their laboratory is world-renowned for their 30 years of work in neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases, particularly Alzheimer's disease. A paper detailing Dr. McGeer's most recent discoveries were published Friday in the prestigious Journal of Alzheimer's Disease.
    In 2016, Dr. McGeer and his team announced that they had developed a simple saliva test that can diagnose Alzheimer's disease, as well as predict its future onset. The test is based on measuring the concentration of the peptide amyloid beta protein 42 (Abeta42) secreted in saliva. In most individuals, the rate of Abeta 42 production is almost exactly the same regardless of sex or age. However, if that rate of production is two to three times higher, those individuals are destined to develop Alzheimer's disease. That is because Abeta42 is a relatively insoluble material, and although it is made everywhere in the body, deposits of it occur only in the brain, causing neuroinflammation, which destroys neurons in the brains of people with Alzheimer's disease.
    Contrary to the widely held belief that Abeta 42 is made only in the brain, Dr. McGeer's team demonstrated that the peptide is made in all organs of the body and is secreted in saliva from the submandibular gland. As a result, with as little as one teaspoon of saliva, it is possible to predict whether an individual is destined to develop Alzheimer's disease. This gives them an opportunity to begin taking early preventive measures such as consuming non-prescription non-steroidal drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen.
    "What we've learned through our research is that people who are at risk of developing Alzheimer's exhibit the same elevated Abeta 42 levels as people who already have it; moreover, they exhibit those elevated levels throughout their lifetime so, theoretically, they could get tested anytime," says Dr. McGeer. "Knowing that the prevalence of clinical Alzheimer's Disease commences at age 65, we recommend that people get tested ten years before, at age 55, when the onset of Alzheimer's would typically begin. If they exhibit elevated Abeta 42 levels then, that is the time to begin taking daily ibuprofen to ward off the disease.
    "Unfortunately, most clinical trials to date have focused on patients whose cognitive deficits are already mild to severe, and when the therapeutic opportunities in this late stage of the disease are minimal. Consequently, every therapeutic trial has failed to arrest the disease's progression. Our discovery is a game changer. We now have a simple test that can indicate if a person is fated to develop Alzheimer's long before it begins to develop. Individuals can prevent that from happening through a simple solution that requires no prescription or visit to a doctor. This is a true breakthrough since it points in a direction where AD can eventually be eliminated."
    More information: Patrick L. McGeer et al, Conquering Alzheimer's Disease by Self Treatment, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease (2018). DOI: 10.3233/JAD-179913