Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Friday, April 10, 2020

Training Conditions Influence Walking Kinematics and Self-Selected Walking Speed in Patients with Neurological Impairments

In the past nine years have we made ANY PROGRESS TOWARDS GETTING WALKING PROTOCOLS? Or are we still in the dark ages where every stroke patient is a guinea pig in an unregistered one person clinical trial?  THIS is why a hell of a lot of people in stroke need to be fired, they aren't solving stroke, just going thru the motions from their university training.

Training Conditions Influence Walking Kinematics and Self-Selected Walking Speed in Patients with Neurological Impairments

Journal of Neurotrauma, 2011

 Gavin Williams,1
Ross Clark,2
Anthony Schache,3
Natalie A. Fini,4
Liz Moore,5
Meg E. Morris,2
and Paul R. McCrory6

Abstract

Gait training is a major focus of rehabilitation for many people with neurological disorders, yet systematic reviews have failed to identify the most effective form of gait training. The main objective of this study was to compare conditions for gait training for people with acquired brain injury (ABI). Seventeen people who had sustained an ABI and were unable to walk without assistance were recruited as a sample. Each participant was exposed to seven alternative gait training conditions in a randomized order. These were: (1) therapist manual facilitation; (2) the use of a gait-assistive device; (3) unsupported treadmill walking; and (4) four variations of  body weight support treadmill training (BWSTT). Quantitative gait analysis was performed and Gait ProfileScores (GPS) were generated for each participant to determine which condition most closely resembled normal walking. BWSTT without additional therapist or self-support of the upper limbs was associated with more severe gait abnormality [Wilks’ lambda=0.20, F(6, 6)=3.99, p=0.047]. With the exception of therapist facilitation, the gait training conditions that achieved the closest approximation of normal walking required self-support of the upper limbs. When participants held on to a stable handrail, self-selected gait speeds were up to three times higher than the speeds obtained for over-ground walking [Wilks’ lambda=0.17, F(6, 7)=5.85, p<0.05]. The provision of stable upper-limb support was associated with high self-selected gait speeds that were not sustained when walking over ground. BWSTT protocols may need to prioritize reduction in self-support of the upper limbs, instead of increasing treadmill speed and reducing body weight support, in order to improve training outcomes.
 

No comments:

Post a Comment